Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2328C38000092; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:03:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TE33q-00007f-RL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:02:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TE33q-00007W-BD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:02:18 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TE33o-0004QO-CN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:02:17 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8IJ2F31029283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:02:15 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8IJ2FXO010794 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:02:15 +0200 Message-ID: <5058C46D.4060704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:58:53 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50589124.1040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello André, OK, i'm going to 20%. Is there any preferred frequency where to go to? Maybe i should go closer to the lower end, arround 137.410 kHz? 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9be3f060697a097db7a337109fbeece1 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090603030003070005070400" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40855058c56d65ee X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090603030003070005070400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q8IJ2F31029283 Hello Andr=E9, OK, i'm going to 20%. Is there any preferred frequency where to go to? Maybe i should go=20 closer to the lower end, arround 137.410 kHz? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.09.2012 18:49, schrieb Andr=E9 Guy=E9: > Hello DK7FC Stefan. > Congrats, but I am sorry because your LF WSPR signal is very strong=20 > here in JN19QB (about 180 =B5V in SPM3), and of course I cannot copy an= y=20 > other station when you are transmitting. > *Please be kind* to set your Tx traction as usual, between 10 to 20 %=20 > instead of 50 %. > The goal of WSPR is to transmit with low power and also to listen the=20 > band for giving some RX reports to other transmitting stations. > It is the same problem, at times, when you are transmitting on OPERA=20 > 32 at 100 % without any pause for listening. In this case, others=20 > stations have no chance ! > Best 73 and good luck. > Andy F6CNI. > -----Message d'origine----- > From: Stefan Sch=E4fer > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:20 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Cc: Joe Taylor ; Edgar J Twining > Subject: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC > So now i joined the WSPR group and start to do some test transmissions > with the normal 2 minute WSPR code, using Markus' tool. The goal is to > see if the tool works properly and what decode levels i can obtain in > various distances. > A 2 minute WSPR beacon is running here in Heidelberg / JN49IK, 50% TX > time. I will run it until tomorrow 6 UTC. > Reports apprechiated :-) > Please can we try to move the LF reports/hour peak in the diagram above > the level of the 20m band? ;-) > Tests using the 8 and 32 minute WSPR will follow soon. > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > PS: TX pwr may be a bit reduced in first tests, abt. - 10 dB f.s. --------------090603030003070005070400 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q8IJ2F31029283 Hello Andr=E9,

OK, i'm going to 20%.
Is there any preferred frequency where to go to? Maybe i should go closer to the lower end, arround 137.410 kHz?

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 18.09.2012 18:49, schrieb Andr=E9 Guy=E9:
Hello DK7FC Stefan.
=A0
Congrats, but I am sorry because your LF WSPR signal is very strong here in JN19QB (about 180 =B5V in SPM3), and of course I cannot copy any other station when you are transmitting.<= /div>
=A0
Please be kind to set your Tx traction as usual,=A0 between 10 to 20 % instead of 50 %.
=A0
The goal of WSPR is to transmit with low power and also to listen the band for giving some RX reports to other transmitting stations.
=A0
It is the same problem, at times, when you are transmitting on OPERA 32 at 100 % without any pause for listening. In this case, others stations have no chance !
=A0
Best 73 and good luck.
=A0
Andy F6CNI.
=A0
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:20 PM
Cc: Joe Taylor ; Edgar J Twining
Subject: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC
=A0
So now i joined the WSPR group and start to do some test transmissions
with the normal 2 minute WSPR code, using Markus' tool. The goal is to
see if the tool works properly and what decode levels i can obtain in
various distances.
=A0
A 2 minute WSPR beacon is running here in Heidelberg / JN49IK, 50% TX
time. I will run it until tomorrow 6 UTC.
=A0
Reports apprechiated :-)
=A0
Please can we try to move the LF reports/hour peak in the diagram above
the level of the 20m band? ;-)
=A0
Tests using the 8 and 32 minute WSPR will follow soon.
=A0
73, Stefan/DK7FC
=A0
PS: TX pwr may be a bit reduced in first tests, abt. - 10 dB f.s.<= /div>
=A0
--------------090603030003070005070400--