Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A9E73380000AB; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDze5-000775-V5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:23:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDze5-00076w-Hs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:23:29 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDze3-0003Zs-Ue for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:23:28 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8IFNQKT018299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:23:26 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8IFNO5k005506; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:23:24 +0200 Message-ID: <50589124.1040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:20:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Joe Taylor , Edgar J Twining X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear LF group, A few days we started a discussion about a slower WSPR here in the group. After that, i've been in contact with K1JT who meant he will work out a slower WSPR version for LF, in a few months (hopefully). [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: LF: WSPR tests by DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a5058921c3dd9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear LF group, A few days we started a discussion about a slower WSPR here in the group. After that, i've been in contact with K1JT who meant he will work out a slower WSPR version for LF, in a few months (hopefully). Markus/DF6NM kindly prepared a tool to generate different types of WSPR. There are 3 versions. The first takes 2 minutes, i.e. the normal WSPR that can be decoded with the normal WSPR software. Then there are slower versions taking 8 and 32 minutes. We want to make some pre-tests to see the SNR improvement of a slower WSPR, i.e. check if it will be confirmed by the SNR display that WSPR-8 shows a 6 dB better SNR (12 dB SNR improvement for WSPR-32 respectively). Hopefully this will result in a new DX-mode on LF (Yes Mal, i know :-) ). So now i joined the WSPR group and start to do some test transmissions with the normal 2 minute WSPR code, using Markus' tool. The goal is to see if the tool works properly and what decode levels i can obtain in various distances. A 2 minute WSPR beacon is running here in Heidelberg / JN49IK, 50% TX time. I will run it until tomorrow 6 UTC. Reports apprechiated :-) Please can we try to move the LF reports/hour peak in the diagram above the level of the 20m band? ;-) Tests using the 8 and 32 minute WSPR will follow soon. 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: TX pwr may be a bit reduced in first tests, abt. - 10 dB f.s.