Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E8B6C3800009A; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDiJd-0005cv-BF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:53:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDiJc-0005cm-SB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:53:12 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDiJa-00006B-W6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:53:11 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8HKr9ni012750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:53:09 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8HKr7d1009849 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:53:08 +0200 Message-ID: <50578CE9.5060002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:49:45 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50565D34.3070603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <505765C1.6050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5057860F.7020509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q8HKr9ni012750 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This one at least yes: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/UA0SNV.png 73, Stefan Am 17.09.2012 22:45, schrieb Graham: > That's over OP8 decode levels ? > > > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:20 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: OP32 > >> 8! >> >> 18:59 136 DK7FC de UA0SNV-1 Op32 5739 km -33 dB in Ust-Ilimsk >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 17.09.2012 22:13, schrieb Graham: >>> 7 dB over the s/n floor :) >>> >>> >>> Monitor: UA0SNV-1 Loc OO17HX >>> Frequency: 0.136 MHz (2200m) >>> Using: Opera v1.4.4/Rptr V1.6 >>> >>> Antenna: Op32_||||||||_~34dB >>> >>> Show all seen by UA0SNV-1 >>> Last report: DK7FC >>> at Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:04:53 GMT >>> >>> >>> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 7:02 PM >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >>> >>>> G.., >>>> >>>> Am 17.09.2012 14:24, schrieb Graham: >>>>> Stefan, >>>>> >>>>> I find the s/n of the two longest paths , being similar , >>>>> interesting as one is sea water and the other over land .. >>>>> had assume the sea path would be many dB better ? >>>> From the SNR you don't get any informations about the local QRN >>>> situation. It may have been very quiet on the path to UA0 and there >>>> may have been many thunderstorms close to W1. W1 is much closer to >>>> the equator so it is more likely that Jay has to fight with some >>>> lightnings on that path... >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> unless there is still some form of masking on the TA path ? >>>>> >>>>> 73 -G.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "Stefan Schäfer" >>>>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:13 AM >>>>> To: >>>>> Subject: LF: OP32 >>>>> >>>>>> LF, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks to the recent overnight monitoring stations. Here is my >>>>>> summary >>>>>> for the last 2 days. >>>>>> [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: Re: LF: OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40950578de73a96 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This one at least yes: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/UA0SNV.png 73, Stefan Am 17.09.2012 22:45, schrieb Graham: > That's over OP8 decode levels ? > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:20 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: OP32 > >> 8! >> >> 18:59 136 DK7FC de UA0SNV-1 Op32 5739 km -33 dB in Ust-Ilimsk >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 17.09.2012 22:13, schrieb Graham: >>> 7 dB over the s/n floor :) >>> >>> >>> Monitor: UA0SNV-1 Loc OO17HX >>> Frequency: 0.136 MHz (2200m) >>> Using: Opera v1.4.4/Rptr V1.6 >>> >>> Antenna: Op32_||||||||_~34dB >>> >>> Show all seen by UA0SNV-1 >>> Last report: DK7FC >>> at Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:04:53 GMT >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" >>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 7:02 PM >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >>> >>>> G.., >>>> >>>> Am 17.09.2012 14:24, schrieb Graham: >>>>> Stefan, >>>>> >>>>> I find the s/n of the two longest paths , being similar ,=20 >>>>> interesting as one is sea water and the other over land .. >>>>> had assume the sea path would be many dB better ? >>>> From the SNR you don't get any informations about the local QRN=20 >>>> situation. It may have been very quiet on the path to UA0 and there=20 >>>> may have been many thunderstorms close to W1. W1 is much closer to=20 >>>> the equator so it is more likely that Jay has to fight with some=20 >>>> lightnings on that path... >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> unless there is still some form of masking on the TA path ? >>>>> >>>>> 73 -G.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>> From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" >>>>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:13 AM >>>>> To: >>>>> Subject: LF: OP32 >>>>> >>>>>> LF, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks to the recent overnight monitoring stations. Here is my=20 >>>>>> summary >>>>>> for the last 2 days. >>>>>> >>>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>>>> >>>> >>