Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D1100380000AC; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TDOCl-0002p7-Tg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:24:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TDOCl-0002oy-CN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:24:47 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TDOCi-0003Sc-NI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:24:46 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8GNOhb3012406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:24:43 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8GNOhKb008296 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: <50565EF3.9020809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:21:23 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5050EA23.1040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <62B8952382DF4DB294DF41CA351C4188@Notebook> <5051C2B6.8080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <067BD06E05C54207A184D8CB4BFEB066@lindavideo> <50522DF1.9050502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0FEA5D7549D94AA398184E6DEACDA6EE@lindavideo> <5053C699.6090300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <08B3DCF1255E403E84FBD7FCBD3C2803@lindavideo> In-Reply-To: <08B3DCF1255E403E84FBD7FCBD3C2803@lindavideo> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q8GNOhb3012406 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ken, My thoughts, Am 16.09.2012 22:07, schrieb Ken: > Hi Stefan. > Thank you for all the filter info, definitely interested in them, at present > for 500kHz I have a homebrew filter using two Toko transformers in between > the antenna socket and two stage rx pre-amp. What RX are you using? And what type of antenna? > There are GE protection diodes > across the input, I should think about that too. 3x Si diodes in series, 2x, antiparallel. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: b99b9f5ebb2905dfac0746d3f825052c Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411650565fea6305 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Ken, My thoughts, Am 16.09.2012 22:07, schrieb Ken: > Hi Stefan. > Thank you for all the filter info, definitely interested in them, at pr= esent > for 500kHz I have a homebrew filter using two Toko transformers in betw= een > the antenna socket and two stage rx pre-amp. What RX are you using? And what type of antenna? > There are GE protection diodes > across the input, I should think about that too. 3x Si diodes in series, 2x, antiparallel. > the pre-amp gain is 0 - 18dB with a variable capacitor to > peak at the operating frequency. What is the BW of that peak? > I was thinking of replacing the 500kHz > filter with this mechanical one, it would save work, just need an input > matching Xformer and change the gate resistor on the input FET. > =20 Yes, the input resistor value can be choosen in a very wide range. Yes,=20 you can use a input Xformer to get some gain. 73, Stefan/DK7FC > Your thoughts please Stefan. > > 73. > > Ken > > M0KHW > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4f= er > Sent: 15 September 2012 01:07 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite > > Hi Ken, > > I just tried to use the 500 Ohm input and the 18k Ohm output. It works > UFB but then i got worried about destroying the filter due to the > up-transformation on the input (the max. input voltage is 2 V rms). Thu= s > i decided to rebuilt the circuit as it has been before and will > eventually use an uptransformer behind the filter. But probably this is > not necessary because the MF noisef floor is still 20 dB above my > RX+soundcard noise floor... > > After readjusting the C, now the passband ripple is< 0.5 dB. > > This is the schematic: > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter%20schematic.png > (You know, someone has done it all before and it is nothing new ;-) ). > > Will you order and use some of them? > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 13.09.2012 21:47, schrieb Ken: > =20 >> Hi Stefan. >> Fully understand. >> >> 73. >> Ken. >> M0KHW >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4= fer >> Sent: 13 September 2012 20:03 >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite >> >> Hi Ken, >> >> OK but later. I want to try some modifications, i.e. using the 500 Ohm >> input and the 18 kOhm output, to have some gain. If this does not affe= ct >> the matching, i would prefer that... >> >> 73, Stefan >> Am 13.09.2012 20:43, schrieb Ken: >> >> =20 >>> Stefan. >>> Thank you for the info, maybe sometime you will be able to post the >>> >>> =20 >> circuit? >> >> =20 >>> 73. >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> M0KHW >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4= fer >>> Sent: 13 September 2012 12:26 >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite >>> >>> Ah yes, Thomas was faster, damn ;-) >>> >>> Another image from the experimental setup, using source followers >>> >>> >>> =20 >> =20 > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/Mechanical_filter_with_source-foll= owers > =20 >> >> =20 >>> .JPG >>> The results have been very good last night! >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> >>> Am 13.09.2012 13:12, schrieb Thomas Rosenkranz: >>> >>> >>> =20 >>>> Hy Ken, >>>> >>>> the name of the mechanical filter is FZ02 >>>> http://www.oppermann-electronic.de/html/hf-spezialbauteile.html >>>> >>>> http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=3DReceiver >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Thomas DM4TR >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken" >>>> To: >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:28 AM >>>> Subject: LF: RE: MF tonite >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Stefan. >>>> What mechanical filter are you using?. >>>> 73. >>>> Ken >>>> M0KHW >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4= fer >>>> Sent: 12 September 2012 21:02 >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: LF: MF tonite >>>> >>>> Christian, >>>> >>>> Are you QRV tonite? I would like to see or better hear the differenc= e of >>>> my RX performance when using my band filter i was testing in the >>>> afternoon. >>>> >>>> It is the mechanical filter which uses source followers at the input= and >>>> output, to provide a constant accurate impedance matching to keep th= e >>>> passband ripple as low as possible. The afternoons tests have been v= ery >>>> promising, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter.png >>>> This is the frequency response: >>>> >>>> >>>> =20 >> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/473%20kHz%20ZF%20Filter%2040%20dB= .png >> >> =20 >>>> >>>> =20 >>> >>> =20 >>>> There should be a much better image rejection now and so maybe a few >>>> more dB SNR... Unfortunately the filter does not cover the 502 kHz >>>> region. But this problem will be gone in some months... >>>> >>>> Will be on 472.5 kHz soon. >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>> >>>> =20 >>> >>> =20 >> >> =20 > > =20