Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6F9B8380000A6; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TCWWX-0001U8-Qp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:05:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TCWWX-0001Tz-Be for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:05:37 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TCWWV-0003tn-2Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:05:36 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8EE5XVL025038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:05:34 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q8EE5XQa004260 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:05:33 +0200 Message-ID: <505338E7.3030603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:02:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, One year of monthly receptions of my full call sign on LF is completed by W1VD and DK7FC. Thanks for the test Jay! :-) https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n0vezbcsrhoyvfz/JWLmm0uJZZ [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: DK7FC to W1VD all the year Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a50533a041990 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, One year of monthly receptions of my full call sign on LF is completed by W1VD and DK7FC. Thanks for the test Jay! :-) https://www.dropbox.com/sh/n0vezbcsrhoyvfz/JWLmm0uJZZ (I suggest to go on with the test until november, so the set of images is looking more equal, i.e. the SpecLab window running at 28 mHz FFT bin width). Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC