Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C51E738000099; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:10:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TBAHT-0005ZY-8k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:08:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TBAHM-0005ZP-Hi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:08:20 +0100 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TBAHK-000605-5Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:08:19 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TBAHI-0005m5-Ns; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:08:16 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:55028 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TBAHI-0001HE-Jy; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:08:16 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.11] (port=51354 helo=1.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TBAEK-0000AO-T1; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:05:12 +0200 Received: from blfd-d9bf6445.pool.mediaways.net ([217.191.100.69]:4955 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 1.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TBAEK-00035s-OT; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <504E47F9.9010703@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:05:13 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RSGB LF Group at blacksheep CC: RSGB LF Group at Yahoo X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Uwe, I have completed the 2nd part of the circuit diagram of my small "linear" PA : http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf_reception/MF_Reception.html#mf_linear_pa [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: LF: Small "linear" medium wave PA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc504e49191e0b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Uwe, I have completed the 2nd part of the circuit diagram of my small "linear" PA : http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf_reception/MF_Reception.html#mf_linear_pa You may have to reload the page (press F5) since it has just been uploaded. IMO, the efficiency for this power range (50 ... 60 watts in my case) is adequate. It's simple, and even when "slightly overdriven" it retains the amplitude ramp of the keying signal from the driving transmitter (IC 706 with 2 watts output on MF). When driven to the clipping point, which is OK for CW, the amplifier drew just above 3 amps DC at 13.8 Volts to produce 30 watts of RF. At that power level, a small heatsink ("CPU cooler") is sufficient. With more turns on the drain output transformer, and a larger heatsink, even more power would be possible, possibly up to 100 watts (which I don't need at DF0WD). The DC overcurrent protection is simple but effective: With the two transistors on the 2nd part of the circuit, the gate bias voltage is simply "pulled down" so the drain current and power dissipation stays in non-lethal limits (for the MOSFETs). The 30 milliohms resistor is just a short piece of 'Constantan' wire. It is barely visible on the photo of the board, near the "DC current sense / limiter". All the best, Wolf .