Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0DE4038000082; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:49:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAio7-0007Bd-RC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:48:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAio7-0007BU-Cq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:48:19 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAio4-0000j1-Sj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:48:18 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q89EmF2N022786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 16:48:15 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q89EmFFh010750 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 16:48:15 +0200 Message-ID: <504CAB71.4040704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:45:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50493001.4050202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> <504A14AD.2070403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00ca01cd8ded$85328aa0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <011501cd8df5$27e95740$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <00a901cd8e70$6e0b2d40$1502a8c0@Clemens04> In-Reply-To: <00a901cd8e70$6e0b2d40$1502a8c0@Clemens04> X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: MF! Thanks to all the stations who tried (successfully or not) to watch out for my OP4 transmissions on 478.7 kHz during the last 3 days. *3278 decodes by 28 stations* were counted here for DK7FC. An overview of stations with successful decodes, showing the best S/N obtained in the test is here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/OP4all28.png The time of the best S/N obtained may be a first parameter which gives some ideas about the MF propagation on the different paths. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend, Results Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070503050803080203010407" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf504cac6629cf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070503050803080203010407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF! Thanks to all the stations who tried (successfully or not) to watch out for my OP4 transmissions on 478.7 kHz during the last 3 days. *3278 decodes by 28 stations* were counted here for DK7FC. An overview of stations with successful decodes, showing the best S/N obtained in the test is here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/OP4all28.png The time of the best S/N obtained may be a first parameter which gives some ideas about the MF propagation on the different paths. I made a SNR plot of some stations who have been on air for a longer time during saturday. The curves are very chaotic of course. Only a few stations can be shown to maintainso the overview. Plot: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/OP4_SNRplot.png To get a better impression of the propagation path of these displayed stations, see: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF_OP4_map.png The discussion can start :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------070503050803080203010407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MF!

Thanks to all the stations who tried (successfully or not) to watch out for my OP4 transmissions on 478.7 kHz during the last 3 days. 3278 decodes by 28 stations were counted here for DK7FC.

An overview of stations with successful decodes, showing the best S/N obtained in the test is here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/OP4all28.png
The time of the best S/N obtained may be a first parameter which gives some ideas about the MF propagation on the different paths.

I made a SNR plot of some stations who have been on air for a longer time during saturday. The curves are very chaotic of course. Only a few stations can be shown to maintainso the overview.
Plot: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/OP4_SNRplot.png

To get a better impression of the propagation path of these displayed stations, see: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF_OP4_map.png

The discussion can start :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------070503050803080203010407--