Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D891238000091; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:13:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAMOY-0005oc-A4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:52:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAMOX-0005oT-PI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:52:25 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAMOV-0004ip-Uu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:52:24 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q88EqNI4018032 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:52:23 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q88EqNNC010435 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: <504B5AE9.2020206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:49:13 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1346962282.2117.22.camel@linux-laptop> <50492CFD.1020004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1347000615.2139.5.camel@linux-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1347000615.2139.5.camel@linux-laptop> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Sabine, Am 07.09.2012 08:50, schrieb Sabine DL1DBC: > [...]What about WSPR from your side? > Regards > Sabine > > Sorry, so far i have a PA and a VFO that runs on the QRG. I'm not using a HF TRX on MF, so there is no FSK in the moment, only CW and Opera. What about CW from your side? :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: Need better glasses Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4082504b609613ae X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Sabine, Am 07.09.2012 08:50, schrieb Sabine DL1DBC: > [...]What about WSPR from your side? > Regards > Sabine > > Sorry, so far i have a PA and a VFO that runs on the QRG. I'm not using a HF TRX on MF, so there is no FSK in the moment, only CW and Opera. What about CW from your side? :-) 73, Stefan