Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F0D3538000544; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 18:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T9O25-0005Nn-AS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:25:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T9O24-0005Ne-QN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:25:12 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T9O23-0001VV-4s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:25:11 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q85MPAGc006294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:25:10 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q85MPAMQ017785 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:25:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5047D08B.50609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:22:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5046503B.3050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <836728322-1346785992-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2129170870-@b17.c17.bise6.blackberry> <50465556.5000909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5046872C.90307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50476D85.7040909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <504771F5.5060703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q85MPAGc006294 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes G.., the land/sea losses ratio is definitively much higher on 472 kHz than on 137 kHz. So all the stations close to the sea clearly have advantages. Maybe i will get some more data for better S/N plots. I need stations in different distances and locations who monitor for 24 hours. That would allow to get a nice overview. I'm not in Heidelberg tonite and so i can do no CW tonite so i will run the TX in OP4 for another night, maybe even much longer. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Subject: Re: LF: MF acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d5047d18a5618 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes G.., the land/sea losses ratio is definitively much higher on 472=20 kHz than on 137 kHz. So all the stations close to the sea clearly have=20 advantages. Maybe i will get some more data for better S/N plots. I need stations in=20 different distances and locations who monitor for 24 hours. That would=20 allow to get a nice overview. I'm not in Heidelberg tonite and so i can do no CW tonite so i will run=20 the TX in OP4 for another night, maybe even much longer. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 05.09.2012 18:35, schrieb Graham: > No decodes Stefan... Looking on the psk map , the path to M0LMH ,=20 > could be sea until HULL , where as I have about 240 miles =20 > of Land , makes a big difference GW on 500 , similarly I have 559 =20 > signals from Ireland over the sea to my west in daytime > > G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Graham" > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 5:25 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > >> DK7FC de SWL-M0LMH (England): Op4 536 mi -26 dB in Harrogate >> >> or 4 dB over :) >> >> G. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer" >> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:38 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: MF acty >> >>> >>> Am 05.09.2012 17:19, schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: >>>> [...]but as soon as the sunrise comes, no signals are detected in=20 >>>> the UK while the levels are 25 dB above the decode limit in the nigh= t. >>> Ehm, no, i've concentrated to much on the plot of G0KTN while=20 >>> writing that. M0LMH even get's daytime decodes on the lower limit,=20 >>> maybe having a somehow better RX-system+location(?)... >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>