Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 87D9938000093; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:13:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T8at7-0004aD-LR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:56:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T8at6-0004a4-Vk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:56:40 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T8at4-00075S-Ip for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:56:39 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q83HubbE007765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:56:38 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q83HubMk002941 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: <5044EE9D.4040902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:53:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001cd8810$7b23f220$716bd660$@com> <002d01cd8853$3f197af0$bd4c70d0$@com> <68C1B4735C85472DA442B70F4963742A@AGB> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, Will you be on air tonite again, using OP32? We could try to get a decode in YV from your signal. The S/N of the recently published capture may allow a OP32 decode. No problem about the fifferent dial frequency. You know, best chances would be arround 8 UTC. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 13ce2d45c6831942db3d21680606cc2e Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d5044f34c5a90 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Joe, Will you be on air tonite again, using OP32? We could try to get a decode in YV from your signal. The S/N of the recently published capture may allow a OP32 decode. No problem about the fifferent dial frequency. You know, best chances would be arround 8 UTC. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.09.2012 02:19, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Graham, Group, > > Absolutely delighted! Many thanks for the help and report. > Martin also sent a capture of the sigs from last night which > was also very gratifying. > > It seems to be set up to TX opera32 every hour now and working > properly so it will not be touched until dawn tomorrow. > > Many thanks for the good news and to those who took the time to > monitor! > 73 > Joe > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Graham wrote: > >> looks like a good start to the night >> >> G.. >> >> 23:26 136 VO1NA de GW0EZY Op32 -34 dB in Welshpool IO82HO >> 23:26 136 VO1NA de G4WGT Op32 -37 dB in Chorley, IO83qo >> >> 23:59 136 VO1NA de F4DTL Op32 -40 dB in Paris France >> 23:59 136 VO1NA de W1TAG Op32 -41 dB in Raymond, ME >> 23:59 136 VO1NA de GW0EZY Op32 -32 dB in Welshpool IO82HO >> 23:59 136 VO1NA de G4WGT Op32 -31 dB in Chorley, IO83qo >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: >> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 11:18 PM >> To: "Graham" >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA >> >>> Hi Graham, Terry and Group >>> >>> Thanks for the report Terry. I also noted a dip in the sigs on >>> the DF6NM grabber and for a moment was concerned that the power >>> supply was in trouble again. Fortunately all was OK. >>> >>> The TX is now transmitting OP32 on 137.777 kHz, 4.5 anps to the 100m >>> wire. >>> >>> Good luck to all and thank-you in advance to those who may be >>> monitoring. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Graham wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Terry >>>> >>>> This where it becomes a little messy >>>> >>>> The mid band audio frequency's are OP32 = 1550 Hz >>>> and OP8 = 1650 Hz >>>> >>>> So for a carrier frequency of 137.777 KHz , that gives Rx >>>> dial set usb of 136.227 for OP32 and 136.127 for OP8 >>>> >>>> As the pass bands are 100 Hz wide , then these will be >>>> +/- 50 Hz max >>>> >>>> So depending on the Rx setting accuracy , you could round >>>> down to the last , 20 Hz or 7 Hz >>>> >>>> Eg my Skanti R5003 tunes in 100 Hz steps , so 136.2 or >>>> 136.1 , would put me 27 Hz off , which all being well , >>>> leaves 20 Hz or so to the filter edge >>>> >>>> All Joe needs to post in advance is the selected mode >>>> speed as a change of speed , will need a Rx re-set . I >>>> don't think Joe's TX P/C is web linked , so there will not >>>> be a TX beacon , >>>> >>>> >>>> 73-G. >>>> >>>> NB:: Now if you want , that could also be translated to a >>>> dial set for LSB as the Opera mode is only 1 tone ........ >>>> but I don't think we will go there just yet .. but would >>>> that drop dfc39 out of the rx pass band .... I wonder .. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Terry GW0EZY >>>> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 4:05 PM >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: RE: LF: VO1NA >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes no problem. Please could you confirm the "dial" frequency? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If Opera could specify left or right audio channels I could do both >>>> sub-bands as SDR-IQ/SpectraVue provides a two channel Rx with >>>> output on L and R channels. Maybe SL could do the split for Opera. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'll keep an eye on BS to see when to set up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 73 Terry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham >>>> Sent: 01 September 2012 12:20 >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Terry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Joe was asking about running Opera beacon on 137.777 as >>>> he is fixed frequency , but problem is arranging a monitor >>>> group as operations are now 136.000 usb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is it possible you could monitor 137.777 using Op mode , If >>>> Joe runs overnight again ? Im sure we can arrange others to >>>> join in >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Tnx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Graham >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Terry GW0EZY >>>> >>>> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 8:07 AM >>>> >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> >>>> Subject: LF: VO1NA >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Screen grab of your signals last night. Strongest appears around >>>> 04:30 UTC with interesting deep QSB dip about 1 hr later. Still >>>> copy at 07:00 UTC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SDR14 with Wellbrook LFL1010 untuned loop >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 73 Terry GW0EZY >>>> >>> >>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and >>> conditions at >>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >> >> >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >