Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7179938000094; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:31:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TA5By-00048X-0t for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:30:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TA5Bw-00048O-VZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:30:16 +0100 Received: from mta41.charter.net ([216.33.127.83]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TA5Bv-0001sv-2K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:30:15 +0100 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta41.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120907203013.OKKS10143.mta41.charter.net@imp09> for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:30:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.101] ([74.94.151.157]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id wLWC1j00F3Q0UcS05LWDmk; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:30:13 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=nlrKf9u5uG3fs/vD0VBbL3/xzyN25p4t1WHsSeqasGo= c=1 sm=1 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:17 a=pSDxxfrZAAAA:8 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=isbdLKrSKqQPaGPmG3MA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=16hDO17SU7oC5XHH:21 a=rVfr4FmqKJeOMkLV:21 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:117 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <50493001.4050202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8E501) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <27A56DC9-8211-4723-A010-0E799FA1A2E6@charter.net> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:30:09 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E501) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: G, The TF3 issue is probably more of a latitude thing. Remember how far north they are. John A. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.83 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db406504a59b05cea X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none G, The TF3 issue is probably more of a latitude thing. Remember how far north t= hey are.=20 John A.=20 On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:27 PM, "Graham" wrote: > Not really , last night rn3agc ? reported Stefan's OP32 signal= was audible from speaker , best signal to TF3 was -14 dB ....shorte= r path as well , may be 7 dB down on previous max and as you say , n= othing TA >=20 > G.. >=20 > -14 OPERA 0.136 07/09/2012 03:2 1346988402 DK7FC JN49IK = TF3HZ >=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "John Andrews" > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 6:00 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend >=20 >> Graham, >>=20 >> I'm assuming that you're just kidding. The paths to Moscow are shorter, a= t higher latitude, and generally don't include the thunderstorm levels we ha= ve in the eastern U.S. >>=20 >> John, W1TAG >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:19 AM, "Graham" wrote: >>=20 >>> First demonstration that what go's East , not always go's West= ! >>>=20 >>> Spectacular s/n levels in the Moscow area but nothing showing >>> TA ? >>>=20 >>> G.. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer" >>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:21 AM >>> To: >>> Subject: LF: LF/MF night and weekend >>>=20 >>>> Hello group, >>>>=20 >>>> Wow, there is really much activity on the band tonite! >>>> I'm back in Heidelberg, now transmitting OP32 on 137.515kHz during repa= iring the MF PA. Later i'll switch back to 477 kHz, depending on what's goin= g on on 137. But at least tomorrow i will run OP4 on 477 again until late su= nday, i.e. more than 24 hours. >>>>=20 >>>> It would be nice to get some 24 hour data from different stations and l= ocations to make a S/N plot showing various propagation phenomena over land a= nd sea. Perhaps saturday 0:00...23:59:59 UTC is a good idea? Suggestions? >>>>=20 >>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>>=20 >=20