Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 81CC638000083; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 10:03:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAi6C-0006wr-LF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:02:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAi6C-0006wi-95 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:02:56 +0100 Received: from relay2.mail.vrmd.de ([81.28.224.28]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAi6A-0000bK-Rm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:02:55 +0100 Received: from [87.185.231.197] (helo=[192.168.0.60]) by relay2.mail.vrmd.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TAi5q-0001Qj-Sk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:02:35 +0200 From: Sabine DL1DBC To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 16:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1347199352.2126.10.camel@linux-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Relay-User: sc@dl1dbc.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, > Sorry, so far i have a PA and a VFO that runs on the QRG. I'm not using > a HF TRX on MF, so there is no FSK in the moment, only CW and Opera. > What about CW from your side? :-) I have a NRD-525, a PA0RDT antenna and a Linux PC. Besides, a DDS controlled by a Arduino managing the WSPR protocol with some milliwatts output and no tx antenna. So I think I lost the game. ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: LF: Need better glasses Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404e504ca1cb2a29 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, > Sorry, so far i have a PA and a VFO that runs on the QRG. I'm not using > a HF TRX on MF, so there is no FSK in the moment, only CW and Opera. > What about CW from your side? :-) I have a NRD-525, a PA0RDT antenna and a Linux PC. Besides, a DDS controlled by a Arduino managing the WSPR protocol with some milliwatts output and no tx antenna. So I think I lost the game. ;-) 73 Sabine