Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3E0B33800009F; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 02:52:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T9sOT-00027d-IS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:50:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T9sOS-00027U-PN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:50:20 +0100 Received: from relay2.mail.vrmd.de ([81.28.224.28]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T9sOR-0007yb-A4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:50:19 +0100 Received: from [80.142.179.60] (helo=[192.168.0.60]) by relay2.mail.vrmd.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T9sOP-0003hD-GI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:50:17 +0200 From: Sabine DL1DBC To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <50492CFD.1020004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <1346962282.2117.22.camel@linux-laptop> <50492CFD.1020004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:50:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1347000615.2139.5.camel@linux-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Relay-User: sc@dl1dbc.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, thank you for your reply! > I've been QRV on that band yesterday to that time but it was 478.7 kHz i > think. But it wasn't QRSS, rather OP4, which may be a bit to fast for > that spectrogram, obviously. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: Need better glasses Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc146504999af422b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, thank you for your reply! > I've been QRV on that band yesterday to that time but it was 478.7 kHz i > think. But it wasn't QRSS, rather OP4, which may be a bit to fast for > that spectrogram, obviously. I think so. > If you like to try in CW or so, we could try on sunday in the late > evening, maybe 21 UTC or later? I am sorry Stefan, but I am still not ready to transmit with the antenna and PA parts waiting to be assembled. What about WSPR from your side? Regards Sabine