Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 00A1138000107; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:59:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TCEO3-0005sQ-05 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:43:39 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TCEO2-0005sH-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:43:38 +0100 Received: from nm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.35]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TCENz-0000hI-NX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:43:37 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.49] by nm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 650820.24505.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 31652 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2012 18:43:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=cggMj5L9tdpDpcgg5zq3zKMmcZ8KJK7JsZfUte0CB6tHvk/eigRLvtIk87iehbrz3ExE17uPs3GHE8FpkZQXu8V+8+bdS0s6LPAcebHTz0V+vbuBtAi1j7X+vhJhq7J0XPRm6faWwwZljJsH7A9LTRerB2v9bB4kmdMEgeyjP1w= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1347561814; bh=kAn5B5BcX6dCjGuAsh2vFScP6ev0mcNRRNZA1VwDZKk=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=Lx5H+9EXxvQ7eEQp3HRUkpKDOemflZVrZBubK3WM1+kFCFT+epdn+Q9ZLSiiw5KvzNeSFtWjN8GHxgvjOaGNitZHNIk2Z59vk5i/iI1dRLQRIEq1UtgHHE9FdPuRKjpnSxUGq/H3vP4I4HsgkIgyw1yrGwiaLY5OBAAl5K2prjY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: hDgBA.gVM1lN80VVrAtwgQZFzDSDoJEqXb0EgoKxlyk.CK9 bP7S1UdHVehmMyBq4SUWnGH8dD60a295f2ENkoxKuA.rY.AF4ZNTHf9WqkOP Qwyn5eCxhzXgDqqIkVMcbEAPCoTHKa7WZ4SHjVUWDJ8ljnh0q5Vxo6d_W9jC SwInzEqyowUdBiKrfz2a5RZITsALspfGeMyFwcN05DoKwZhBV5CiekzSuKdT vKGU9il_THe9KIpa44fM645JQ3.qZFsdnrC5.PZ19f7UypgJ3ZyjHmWag9iW TTzq4O1aPsZoKPboUCQMdwJG0uadbfRASbe_Q8AAUmDbuL2pxUNlZyxpmEqA Svp8VTxa9eXVbfPRrazqYiY0ZopRM2IPU4n7ovz4ltH8NxNUIMAo6M0riQUL 8nxfdJGEqGyUML6pkOOt111W7X3hw1cwuFoE2RenWc.nCF9h1q517Hl5l7Xi E3G.T5ODkQpq9.gLaSLVfQFJFozJghk9gywPSwO.IjH9ZSVTTAGlCbeVSYnj CSrg.5tt4erLXAx1FhTePjW7MMoAi1i3.nyu38iZAdv4qwOL3xOKhDt_dLyh PuulRixMrosBRmW2pjNEcrXHZKQWrnz7WuaO0b5ApxhXFkdPn2CyT_e3PvKQ WcJBAZ5XVaGmJrhUIvNsb8KUNJJ.qQduUMjt6FGMnO01rpKmxbSTTXGDdCWo qk6_HyPH..63Fyg4BsnXEq4woSSY5nlQTGrwo9vqiBYVP X-Yahoo-SMTP: 9Y6mUHuswBAgnrOsukIiNdFDf95uy_Dz34nY1hlg2liKgYD952sjbg-- Received: from lindavideo (ken.h.wright@86.171.160.81 with login) by smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2012 11:43:34 -0700 PDT From: "Ken" To: References: <5050EA23.1040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <62B8952382DF4DB294DF41CA351C4188@Notebook> <5051C2B6.8080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:43:34 +0100 Message-ID: <067BD06E05C54207A184D8CB4BFEB066@lindavideo> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 In-Reply-To: <5051C2B6.8080303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Thread-Index: Ac2Rox8JjeeOf5qPQAaQujAnagclXwAPFITQ X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan. Thank you for the info, maybe sometime you will be able to post the circuit? 73. Ken [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.35 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 11963a33d604c33786d8f1de94ce267f Subject: RE: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604c50522d194255 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan. Thank you for the info, maybe sometime you will be able to post the = circuit? 73. Ken M0KHW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: 13 September 2012 12:26 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite Ah yes, Thomas was faster, damn ;-) Another image from the experimental setup, using source followers=20 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/Mechanical_filter_with_source-follow= ers .JPG The results have been very good last night! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 13.09.2012 13:12, schrieb Thomas Rosenkranz: > Hy Ken, > > the name of the mechanical filter is FZ02=20 > http://www.oppermann-electronic.de/html/hf-spezialbauteile.html > > http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=3DReceiver > > 73 > Thomas DM4TR > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:28 AM > Subject: LF: RE: MF tonite > > > Hi Stefan. > What mechanical filter are you using?. > 73. > Ken > M0KHW > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer > Sent: 12 September 2012 21:02 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: MF tonite > > Christian, > > Are you QRV tonite? I would like to see or better hear the difference = of > my RX performance when using my band filter i was testing in the=20 > afternoon. > > It is the mechanical filter which uses source followers at the input = and > output, to provide a constant accurate impedance matching to keep the > passband ripple as low as possible. The afternoons tests have been = very > promising, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter.png > This is the frequency response: > = https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/473%20kHz%20ZF%20Filter%2040%20dB.pn= g > > > There should be a much better image rejection now and so maybe a few > more dB SNR... Unfortunately the filter does not cover the 502 kHz > region. But this problem will be gone in some months... > > Will be on 472.5 kHz soon. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 12.09.2012 21:01, schrieb C. Groeger: >> Thanks, mal for these wise words! >> Df5qg (Homebrew& CW) >> >> Christian Groeger >> >> mal hamilton schrieb: >> >> >>> Never replace the MORSE KEY, you do at your peril !! >>> Other modes come and go but MORSE lives on >>> All Radio Operators know this. >>> >>> G3KEV >>> >>> > >