Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D695380002AC; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:43:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TIKiO-00040r-Ep for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:41:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TIKiN-00040i-V1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:41:51 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TIKiM-0002kX-1c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:41:50 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgWAMJYaFBcF/hV/2dsb2JhbABEijmybgEBAoEKgQmCGwUBAQQBCAEBAyUBIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQEKhXaBYgMJCq9tCIlZij1iLkgpPlOEGwONaYkVjxaCZ4Fj X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,513,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="552086536" Received: from host-92-23-248-85.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.248.85]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2012 15:41:48 +0100 Message-ID: <008401cd9f19$b7883c10$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50674D2D.2030402@freenet.de> <50677CBB.7030200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9B65821C1A2842CEA839D2E9FCDC7123@gnat> <005201cd9eb2$bd6da820$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:41:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.4 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alan That is a valid suggestion. The thing that puzzles me is some of those that redicule BS frequently are still reading and posting to the BS REFLECTOR. It seems that all the hot stuff ie technical discussions about rigs and antennas and topics like DX propagation and arrangements for skeds happen on BS. I am in direct contact with some DX stations about engaging in CW/QRSS QSO'S both simplex and xband for those that cannot TX on LF/MF When propagation permits I shall fire up like I did years ago in a calculated manner and not Beacon wildly hoping for a chance strike. I have worked many JA stations over the years on 160 metres and some of these stations would like to work two way with EU on 500 Khz and they would reply on the lower end of the 160 metre band CW. A couple of VK top band CW dxers have expressed a similar interest. I did hear a VK6 top band dxer on 24 Mhz this morning on CW [...] Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 4.4 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: Re: LF: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_EXPERIENCE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd50685a776ef9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Alan That is a valid suggestion. The thing that puzzles me is some of those that redicule BS frequently are still reading and posting to the BS REFLECTOR. It seems that all the hot stuff ie technical discussions about rigs and antennas and topics like DX propagation and arrangements for skeds happen on BS. I am in direct contact with some DX stations about engaging in CW/QRSS QSO'S both simplex and xband for those that cannot TX on LF/MF When propagation permits I shall fire up like I did years ago in a calculated manner and not Beacon wildly hoping for a chance strike. I have worked many JA stations over the years on 160 metres and some of these stations would like to work two way with EU on 500 Khz and they would reply on the lower end of the 160 metre band CW. A couple of VK top band CW dxers have expressed a similar interest. I did hear a VK6 top band dxer on 24 Mhz this morning on CW de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: test > Hi Jay the problem being we dont have ready access to Blacksheep. I suggest > no-one cross posts messages they do not originate. This is the only polite > way. > > I thought there was a mirror/archive of Blacksheep messages in the US....I > remember seeing one about 10 years ago....but cant find it now so it must > have died. It is easy enough to set up a Yahoo private group and have all > the facilities that seem to be required....continuing with this Group in the > present conditions is just a hassle. I would have thought an "open" group > would be a better way to encourage new LF stations. A poster can delete > their own messages if they dont want them to persist. You can pull up all > you posts and delete in one go. They may be cached for a while but will soon > "decay". You cannot "hide" an email address easily, though you may be able > to use an anonymous site. I have no experience of that. > > Alan G3NYK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 3:24 AM > Subject: Re: LF: test > > > > Alan > > > > Another possible solution ... > > > > Everyone on this list could indicate their preference ... 1) okay to > > cross-post without permission, 2) okay to cross-post with permission or 3) > > cross-posts never allowed. It would seem that this could be done with a > > 'gentleman's agreement'. If not, anyone that cross-posts against the > > desires of the originator will be subject to removal from this list. > > > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alan Melia" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:45 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: test > > > > > >> You can actually set up a private group on Yahoo where members only see > >> the messages. I use these for a number of different committee. There is > >> no access to messages outside the group members, and messages are not > >> open to google style searches.In fact no one else knows the group exists! > >> > >> Alan > >> G3NYK > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" > >> To: > >> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56 PM > >> Subject: Re: LF: test > >> > >> > >>> ...i am extremely irritated to see my emails and even my email adress in > >>> this reflector beeing permanently forwarded to the web, i.e. certain > >>> public groups. Thus i consider to reduce my activity here and > >>> communicate with the few really active people directly, at least for > >>> some time. > >>> > >>> Stefan/DK7FC > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 29.09.2012 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > >>>> .. suspiciously quiet here on the reflector, especially for a weekend > >>>> .. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >