Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 84FEB3800008F; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFaU5-0006VD-9E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:55:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFaU4-0006V4-KU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:55:44 +0100 Received: from qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFaU2-0001JZ-JH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:55:43 +0100 Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2Qtz1k0010Fqzac5BQvjAk; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:55:43 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2QvZ1k00J0CFS1j3UQvZtg; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:55:34 +0000 Message-ID: <004d01cd9926$26739b50$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <7F2208077DA448F78F384AF5B55DECA0@White> <505DD1D8.70901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <829FB31FADAD4D4682EC509D2416C9F4@AGB> <005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <0865DC8F-C867-4D80-8149-D2474B51ED63@gmail.com> <505E55F3.8020502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:55:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Thanks for the test signal ... and thanks to Markus and Wolf for the tools! Got in early evening and was hurrying to get things patched together and lined up ... thus the frequency mistke on the first decode. [...] Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: fb42d311bf65eb51bbb8124890b4f977 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01CD9904.9EF92760" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4056505e5e477733 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CD9904.9EF92760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Stefan Thanks for the test signal ... and thanks to Markus and Wolf for the tools! Got in early evening and was hurrying to get things patched together and lined up ... thus the frequency mistke on the first decode. Dst is at a favorable at -16 nT but static is up a bit tonight due to a cold front approaching to the west. In fact, thunderstorms are predicted so I may have to make a quick exit a bit later! Congrats to you and Markus! Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 8:21 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Jay, Thank you once again! Congrats to your equipment! Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2012-09-23 00:08 DK7FC 0.136164 -27 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 2012-09-22 23:48 DK7FC 0.136223 -26 0 JN49ik 1 W1VD FN31ls 6099 295 How do you estimate the conds today? From your experience, is the SNR improvement of WSPR-8 significantly? Hard to estimate if it is really 6 dB... Will see how things proceed in the night. 8 minutes is still a good time to detect changes in propagation.. 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CD9904.9EF92760 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Stefan
 
Thanks for the test signal ... and = thanks=20 to Markus and Wolf for the tools! Got in early evening and was = hurrying to=20 get things patched together and lined up ... thus the = frequency mistke on=20 the first decode.
 
Dst is at a favorable at -16 nT but = static is up a=20 bit tonight due to a cold front approaching to the west. In fact, = thunderstorms=20 are predicted so I may have to make a quick exit a bit = later!
 
Congrats to you and = Markus!
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2
   
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer
Sent: Saturday, September 22, = 2012 8:21=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: = Experimental=20 software for WSPR-8 and -32

Jay,

Thank you once again! Congrats to your=20 equipment!

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2012-09-23 00:08   DK7FC   0.136164   -27   0   JN49ik   1   W1VD   FN31ls   6099   295 
 2012-09-22 23:48   DK7FC   0.136223   -26   0   JN49ik   1   W1VD   FN31ls   6099   295 

How = do you=20 estimate the conds today? From your experience, is the SNR improvement = of=20 WSPR-8 significantly? Hard to estimate if it is really 6 dB...
Will = see how=20 things proceed in the night.
8 minutes is still a good time to = detect=20 changes in propagation..

73, = Stefan/DK7FC
------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CD9904.9EF92760--