Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3530D3800008B; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFVH1-0002pL-VR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:21:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFVH1-0002pC-A8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:21:55 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFVGz-0007xl-7i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:21:54 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4MADn1XVBcHYSK/2dsb2JhbABFp1GVUwECgQSBCYIbBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh3i4QYscG4EBZIQqA4ghhUaYIYJn X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,467,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="385365135" Received: from host-92-29-132-138.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.132.138]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 22 Sep 2012 20:21:51 +0100 Message-ID: <004901cd98f7$83a47670$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <505E0C74.9040704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:21:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is wonderful progress there will soon be one Data mode for each LF es MF operator Like ships passing in he night !! de g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:07 PM Subject: LF: JT-8 ! [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 FSL_UA FSL_UA 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: eb65b97b00a71049be1fa526941c7b31 Subject: LF: Re: JT-8 ! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD98F7.836FF8F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cd505e10067d17 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD98F7.836FF8F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is wonderful progress there will soon be one Data mode for each LF = es MF operator Like ships passing in he night !! de g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:07 PM Subject: LF: JT-8 ! FYI, message from Joe/K1JT (permission to forward it to the group). 73, Stefan/DK7FC -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Fwd: LF: = Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32=20 Datum: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:11:10 -0400=20 Von: Joe Taylor=20 =20 An: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 [...] I had some free time recently to think further about a more sensitive=20 mode for MF and LF use. Here is a very brief and preliminary planning=20 statement, including simulation results for the decoding thresholds that = should be reached. ############################## JT8 ################################### JT8 is a mode designed for amateur QSOs and beacon-like transmissions at = MF and LF. The mode uses the same 72-bit user messages as JT65,=20 augmented by a 12-bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC). Error-control=20 coding uses a convolutional code with constraint length K=3D16, rate=20 r=3D1/2, and a zero tail, leading to an encoded message length of=20 (72+12+15)*2 =3D 198 bits. Modulation is 8-FSK, so a transmission=20 requires 198/3 =3D 66 information-carrying channel symbols. Two 8x8=20 Costas arrays are added to each transmission for purposes of time and=20 frequency synchronization. A full transmission thus contains 66 + 16 = =3D=20 82 symbols. Tone spacing df of the 8-FSK modulation is equal to the=20 keying rate; symbol duration tsym =3D 1/df, and the total occupied=20 bandwidth is 8*df. The actual transmission length TxT is slightly less=20 than the T/R sequence time, to allow for possible message decoding=20 before the next transmission starts. Parameters of the five JT8 sub-modes are summarized in the following=20 table, along with S/N thresholds measured by simulation on an AWGN=20 (additive white Gaussian noise) channel. Mode T/R TxT df tsym BW S/N* (m) (s) (Hz) (s) (Hz) (dB) ----------------------------------------------- JT8-1 1 52 1.577 0.63 12.6 -26.9 JT8-2 2 112 0.732 1.37 5.9 -30.2 JT8-5 5 292 0.281 3.56 2.2 -34.4 JT8-10 10 592 0.139 7.22 1.1 -37.5 JT8-30 30 1792 0.046 21.85 0.4 -42.3 ----------------------------------------------- * Noise power measured in a 2500 Hz bandwidth. ######################################################################## As you can see, with 2-minute transmissions JT8-2 has 1-2 dB better=20 sensitivity than WSPR. This is because 8-FSK is more efficient than=20 4-FSK and because in JT8 less Tx energy is "wasted" on the=20 synchronization task. JT8-30 does about 12 dB better than JT8-2. As time is available in coming weeks, I hope to start some coding. Your comments would of course be welcome! -- 73, Joe, K1JT ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD98F7.836FF8F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is wonderful progress there will soon be = one Data=20 mode for each LF es MF operator
Like ships passing in he night !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, September 22, = 2012 7:07=20 PM
Subject: LF: JT-8 !

FYI, message from Joe/K1JT  (permission to forward = it to=20 the group).

73, Stefan/DK7FC

-------- Original-Nachricht = --------=20
Betreff: Re: Fwd: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and = -32
Datum: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:11:10 -0400
Von: Joe Taylor
An: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
[...]
I had some free time recently to think further about a more sensitive=20
mode for MF and LF use.  Here is a very brief and preliminary planning=20
statement, including simulation results for the decoding thresholds that =

should be reached.

############################## JT8 ###################################

JT8 is a mode designed for amateur QSOs and beacon-like transmissions at =

MF and LF.  The mode uses the same 72-bit user messages as JT65,=20
augmented by a 12-bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC).  Error-control=20
coding uses a convolutional code with constraint length K=3D16, rate=20
r=3D1/2, and a zero tail, leading to an encoded message length of=20
(72+12+15)*2 =3D 198 bits.  Modulation is 8-FSK, so a transmission=20
requires 198/3 =3D 66 information-carrying channel symbols.  Two 8x8=20
Costas arrays are added to each transmission for purposes of time and=20
frequency synchronization.  A full transmission thus contains 66 + 16 =
=3D=20
82 symbols.  Tone spacing df of the 8-FSK modulation is equal to the=20
keying rate; symbol duration tsym =3D 1/df, and the total occupied=20
bandwidth is 8*df.  The actual transmission length TxT is slightly less=20
than the T/R sequence time, to allow for possible message decoding=20
before the next transmission starts.

Parameters of the five JT8 sub-modes are summarized in the following=20
table, along with S/N thresholds measured by simulation on an AWGN=20
(additive white Gaussian noise) channel.

Mode   T/R   TxT    df    tsym   BW    S/N*
       (m)   (s)   (Hz)    (s)  (Hz)   (dB)
-----------------------------------------------
JT8-1    1    52  1.577   0.63  12.6  -26.9
JT8-2    2   112  0.732   1.37   5.9  -30.2
JT8-5    5   292  0.281   3.56   2.2  -34.4
JT8-10  10   592  0.139   7.22   1.1  -37.5
JT8-30  30  1792  0.046  21.85   0.4  -42.3
-----------------------------------------------
* Noise power measured in a 2500 Hz bandwidth.

########################################################################

As you can see, with 2-minute transmissions JT8-2 has 1-2 dB better=20
sensitivity than WSPR.  This is because 8-FSK is more efficient than=20
4-FSK and because in JT8 less Tx energy is "wasted" on the=20
synchronization task.  JT8-30 does about 12 dB better than JT8-2.

As time is available in coming weeks, I hope to start some coding.

Your comments would of course be welcome!

	-- 73, Joe, K1JT
------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CD98F7.836FF8F0--