Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3701A380000BA; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:42:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TBUTN-0000qc-Er for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:42:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TBUTN-0000qT-0K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:42:05 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUTL-0002uM-85 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:42:03 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMUAIt2T1BOk8Dn/2dsb2JhbABFhgeELrAVAQECgQKBCIIbBQEBBAEIAQEDFg8BIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAwIFIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh20DCQqoPoQtjxGBIYkMYxsrGWSBRIINgRIDjWOYGYJmgWM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,406,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="550379090" Received: from host-78-147-192-231.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.192.231]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 11 Sep 2012 18:42:02 +0100 Message-ID: <001701cd9044$bdf83a70$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <504F27D5.8040305@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:41:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Take a look at the cct that the Decca 5501 uses and copy this for robust and failsafe resualts. A series PA tank cct resonated at the frequency of interest is desireable. This is what I am currently using on both 500 es 137 and find it very reliable. The module gets barely warm but of course I am not using it for BROADCAST mode at qrs 6000000000000000 I use the amp in QSO mode mostly and QRSS no slower than 30 sec dot but usually QRSS 3 - 10 de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.7 FSL_UA FSL_UA 2.6 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 4c0633a540d76adc241b9d3cede72a57 Subject: Re: LF: MF PA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a504f781c6b2f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Take a look at the cct that the Decca 5501 uses and copy this for robust and failsafe resualts. A series PA tank cct resonated at the frequency of interest is desireable. This is what I am currently using on both 500 es 137 and find it very reliable. The module gets barely warm but of course I am not using it for BROADCAST mode at qrs 6000000000000000 I use the amp in QSO mode mostly and QRSS no slower than 30 sec dot but usually QRSS 3 - 10 de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:00 PM Subject: Re: LF: MF PA > Hi Christian, > > > -------- Originalnachricht -------- > > Betreff: Re: LF: MF PA > > Von: "C. Groeger" > > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Cc: > > > > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for these infos! > > This is always helpful because I'm not a really good technican. Everything I built was a mixtiure of my ideas and stuff from the net... > > Output power is 100 w, measured with a 100 w bulb, matched to 50 ohms via transformer. Thus efficiency is ok, I think. > > The overall setup is: > > Vxo/xo 10 mc/10.24 mc, mixer, Fd, > > PreDriver 2n2219, Driver irf640, pa 2 x irf 540. > > I have attached a foto... > > 73, df5qg > > > > There is no photo attached. Note that attachments on this reflector must > not exceed 400 kB (or so). Otherwiese the email is rejected. Better use > a dropbox link for large attachments, so people can decide if they want > to have a look at it before downloading all the stuff. > > Well, 100W out at 120W in is 83% efficiency. And 20W losses can't be a > problem for 2 TO-220 FETs as long as you use a suitable heat sink and > reasonable thermal coupling. > > But i'm not sure how you measure 100W RF power with a 100W bulb. Is > there no reactive component of the impedance of that bulb when running > at 475 kHz? > > Take a look to the gate voltage, be sure that it is a real rectangular > wave. Also run the PA in CW-key-down without connecting a load or a low > pass filter and check if the output transformer becomes warm or hot. > Maybe the core material is not suitable or the number of primary turns > is to low? I don't expect overvoltage problems from a 100V FET at 12V > DC supply voltage. Just some ideas... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >