Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 701A4380000AD; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:04:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TIEUi-0002w6-RL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:03:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TIEUi-0002vx-DS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:03:20 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TIEUg-0001lq-5Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:03:19 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar8YADXuZ1BcF/hV/2dsb2JhbABFijmybQEBAoEKgQmCGwUBAQQBCAEBAyUBIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQEKhXaBYgMJCrAKCIlZij1iLkgpPlN7gyADjWmJFY8WgmeBYw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,512,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="394975597" Received: from host-92-23-248-85.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.248.85]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2012 09:03:16 +0100 Message-ID: <000901cd9ee2$0b479310$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50674D2D.2030402@freenet.de> <50677CBB.7030200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9B65821C1A2842CEA839D2E9FCDC7123@gnat> <005201cd9eb2$bd6da820$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:03:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.4 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jay When someone posts on a particular Reflector that is their choice in the first place and it is not intended that someone else re posts on a different reflector There is no need for any agreement but just leave the original posting alone [...] Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 4.4 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404d5067fd106170 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jay When someone posts on a particular Reflector that is their choice in the first place and it is not intended that someone else re posts on a different reflector There is no need for any agreement but just leave the original posting alone g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 2:24 AM Subject: Re: LF: test > Alan > > Another possible solution ... > > Everyone on this list could indicate their preference ... 1) okay to cross-post without permission, > 2) okay to cross-post with permission or 3) cross-posts never allowed. It would seem that this could > be done with a 'gentleman's agreement'. If not, anyone that cross-posts against the desires of the > originator will be subject to removal from this list. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Melia" > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: LF: test > > > > You can actually set up a private group on Yahoo where members only see the messages. I use these > > for a number of different committee. There is no access to messages outside the group members, and > > messages are not open to google style searches.In fact no one else knows the group exists! > > > > Alan > > G3NYK > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: test > > > > > >> ...i am extremely irritated to see my emails and even my email adress in this reflector beeing > >> permanently forwarded to the web, i.e. certain public groups. Thus i consider to reduce my > >> activity here and communicate with the few really active people directly, at least for some time. > >> > >> Stefan/DK7FC > >> > >> > >> Am 29.09.2012 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > >>> .. suspiciously quiet here on the reflector, especially for a weekend .. > >> > > > > > >