Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 57A45380037ED; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:51:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TGuDx-0006yN-QE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:12:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TGuDw-0006yE-VN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:12:32 +0100 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TGuDu-0001q5-Mj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:12:31 +0100 Received: by bkuw5 with SMTP id w5so325254bku.16 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :x-gm-message-state; bh=3XSToWhR+9aAi/eebp3ReIkK1dfd4PgMhQ8EdZBxMCI=; b=nlK26K3aoUBSy+3zrlX/BnD5Pn27SPfPsCO4jjIB71uR03IBow5oiERhTAYHZOo1PK PE7rqKc27vQd/iIUAEC4uakBfw2eYbIAofawW+Ij/Fgyjht8ImwrwiUsPYkFg5AgHfXp i8PRnFBjEzmFciJ64su8JE60TOcNN5KnA+Dzl1Y4rwgDlbcwJSMCxxDKgh0I4qztamrh B91yI+mxTS120XfGbYG+dd2m8lsEfeeAZVuP5MJoQgWXJIf6mK7epywQtxbAALomDYWo gbohNTslTw6UbBVE+LqMVtFyFKMd39CuirLglbwnbec/UPjKC1R3qJAPIwfaUPs5/cHB PH7g== Received: by 10.204.132.77 with SMTP id a13mr4670691bkt.99.1348501910224; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.132.77 with SMTP id a13mr4670681bkt.99.1348501909946; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Win7Pro (host86-132-15-36.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.15.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z25sm4559630bkz.15.2012.09.24.08.51.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:51:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Terry GW0EZY To: References: <7F2208077DA448F78F384AF5B55DECA0@White> <505DD1D8.70901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <829FB31FADAD4D4682EC509D2416C9F4@AGB> <005d01cd98fe$74bc6030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <0865DC8F-C867-4D80-8149-D2474B51ED63@gmail.com> <505E55F3.8020502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004d01cd9926$26739b50$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <6ECF47A4215C4DED9E68C3058165ACD5@White> <505F0488.2010709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009a01cd9993$e4e0c370$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <505F3407.1050907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004401cd99ab$58954f90$09bfeeb0$@com> <505F419B.5010603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000001cd9a27$a198f350$e4cad9f0$@com> <50606492.8050609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4DA2B725C5F24DBF83D78791853C0E36@intelp4> <50607B82.8090807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50607B82.8090807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:51:44 +0100 Message-ID: <000801cd9a6c$81842900$848c7b00$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2aaWrwaWiO2CyZSH6d8WxT1lQ6EAAAkuOg Content-Language: en-gb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXtxKrL47hBED+JF38cONz8clQBtfKCM7hEuzG0xCRuS4z5VjASVvS0iTRWiTHVYSutj5rJtY3PrVNNdUII+dVkofQS1vvVUjeqHK1GSg2i1jTMtxisdqiy3YTflnQH59s1sO1zyOm4Lst7ZMGmfQ2Uoc4lxt1XOilvFvwggWHI6TU47EG0C+d7//1KU2SpDNee1Kw X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan My SDR was set with a “Dial” QRG = 135.164 and an audio B/W = 2kHz so your sig at 136.164 should be in the centre. Here is the wave file recorded with SL using the file menu-“log input as wave file – without Markus WSPR-Shifter. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: edae4bc128aa121544439b7b7cfd26a1 Subject: RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01CD9A74.E3489100" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408250635cc83cbe X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CD9A74.E3489100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan =20 My SDR was set with a =93Dial=94 QRG =3D 135.164 and an audio B/W =3D = 2kHz so your sig at 136.164 should be in the centre. =20 Here is the wave file recorded with SL using the file menu-=93log input = as wave file =96 without Markus WSPR-Shifter. =20 I=92ve had a listen =96 it sounds like it should but I couldn=92t hear = your WSPR only Mal testing! Started at 15:30 UTC stopped at 15:40 UTC =20 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10326787/DK7FC-1.wav =20 Hope its what you wanted =96 still time for another before your QRSS = sked. =20 73 Terry =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: 24 September 2012 16:26 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 =20 Hi Terry,=20 Thanks, that's fine! >From your Opera and WSPR decodes i know that your receive location and equipment must be excellent. So i think the background noise is such a recording can be seen as a reference. That may be better than white = noise (i'm not an expert of that stuff). Is my signal OK or should it be weaker or stronger? 73, Stefan Am 24.09.2012 17:14, schrieb Terry GW0EZY:=20 Stefan =20 Just reading your email and the later correction for 10 minutes. Will = need some setting up. =20 OK I will give it a try. =20 It is now 15:14 UTC =20 73 Terry=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CD9A74.E3489100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan

 

My SDR was set with a “Dial” QRG =3D 135.164 and an audio = B/W =3D 2kHz so your sig at 136.164 should be in the = centre.

 

Here is the wave file recorded with SL using the file menu-“log = input as wave file – without Markus = WSPR-Shifter.

 

I’ve had a listen – it sounds like it should but I = couldn’t hear your WSPR only Mal testing! Started at 15:30 UTC = stopped at 15:40 UTC

 

https://dl.dropbox= .com/u/10326787/DK7FC-1.wav

 

Hope its what you wanted – still time for another before your = QRSS sked.

 

73 Terry

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: 24 September 2012 16:26
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Experimental = software for WSPR-8 and -32

 

Hi Terry, =

Thanks, that's fine!
From your Opera and WSPR decodes i know = that your receive location and equipment must be excellent. So i think = the background noise is such a recording can be seen as a reference. = That may be better than white noise (i'm not an expert of that = stuff).

Is my signal OK or should it be weaker or = stronger?

73, Stefan

Am 24.09.2012 17:14, schrieb Terry = GW0EZY:

St= efan

&n= bsp;

Ju= st reading your email and the later correction for 10 minutes. Will need = some setting up.

&n= bsp;

OK= I will give it a try.

&n= bsp;

It= is now 15:14 UTC

&n= bsp;

73= Terry

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CD9A74.E3489100--