Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B25B83800009D; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:25:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TG6m2-000614-T4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:24:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TG6m2-00060v-6s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:24:26 +0100 Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.64]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TG6m0-00080b-AN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:24:25 +0100 Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2zLp1k0010QuhwU57zQSHq; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:24:26 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2zPx1k00Q0CFS1j3NzPxFF; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:23:58 +0000 Message-ID: <000701cd9a47$25527990$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <505F86FA.2030007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:24:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Good T/A copy of your WSPR-32 transmission ... unfortunately no reception of DF6NM. All available time slots were received. 05:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -16 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 04:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -20 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 03:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -25 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 02:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -21 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 01:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -23 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 00:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -19 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-23 23:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -21 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-23 [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.64 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: LF: T/A WSPR-32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410c5060433a33fe X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Good T/A copy of your WSPR-32 transmission ... unfortunately no reception of DF6NM. All available time slots were received. 05:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -16 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 04:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -20 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 03:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -25 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 02:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -21 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 01:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -23 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-24 00:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -19 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-23 23:30 DK7FC 0.136164 -21 0 JN49ik +30 1.000 W1VD FN31ls 6099 3790 2012-09-23 The database appears to have all my receptions although it's operation has been intermittant lately. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: Chris Gomoiu Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 6:02 PM Subject: LF: SL NB in WSPR-32 ? Hello Chris, I wonder if there could be an improvement by using the SpecLab noise reduction technics in series to the audio line to the WSPR program. Would you like to try that? For me it makes no sense, because Markus is +10 dB S/N here ;-) You're already running the EU60 SL instance. This one adds a bandpass of about 2.5 kHz width to the wideband spectrum of your receivers in 4X and YO. Behind this filter there is the Noiseblanker which improves QRSS/DFCW reception by at least 6 dB at nighttime, as we know. If you put the sound output of this SL instance to VAC2-in and define it VAC2-out as the standard audio device, then it should work. Of course the sound output in SL must be enabled. If WSPR limits the input spectrum to 200 Hz, like we do in the IQ soundfile generated by sndinput, then there can't be adequate sferic blanking because 200 Hz is to narrow. Sferic blanking may be not such an advantage on HF, at least on the higher frequencies. It would be interesting to see the difference. Maybe it makes things worse but i can't imagine. What do you and Markus and others think? 73, Stefan/DK7FC