Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3355D380000BB; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6hsD-0004i7-NB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:59:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6hsD-0004hy-5S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:59:57 +0100 Received: from mta41.charter.net ([216.33.127.83]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6hsA-0004tR-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:59:56 +0100 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta41.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120829125951.HLAW10143.mta41.charter.net@imp09> for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:59:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([74.94.151.157]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id sczr1j0023Q0UcS05czr7e; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:59:51 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=nlrKf9u5uG3fs/vD0VBbL3/xzyN25p4t1WHsSeqasGo= c=1 sm=1 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=QDPlduibJGEA:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:17 a=EWdtduBZvVFucRpwJj0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ejtJoL0ZZT7mxq6cVE868A==:117 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <503D5BDD.1030501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503D7BA9.7030404@charter.net> <503D7A4D.3030802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503DF6D9.40003@charter.net> <503E00F4.50300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8E501) In-Reply-To: <503E00F4.50300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:59:49 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E501) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stephan, I rarely show up on the PSK reporter site from my home QTH. Maybe it's a router/port thing. The site in Maine is usually OK. John, W1TAG/WD2XES [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.83 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Subject: Re: LF: OP8 T/A? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4091503e129a247d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stephan, I rarely show up on the PSK reporter site from my home QTH. Maybe it's a rou= ter/port thing. The site in Maine is usually OK.=20 John, W1TAG/WD2XES On Aug 29, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: > Hello John , >=20 > OH! Good work, congrats to your receive equpiment! That is amazing. In the= first moment i thought there were no decodes in our test because no red lin= es are shown in the pskmap. But later i found them in the text. > Many thanks for the test. It's nice to detect that peak of best propagatio= n, in 8 minute intervals. In a spectrogram it would work as well of course..= . > So i still don't know if Jay got some results too? >=20 > A summary of detections showing up here is attached (all T/A and the highe= st S/N of the others) >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 > Am 29.08.2012 13:02, schrieb John Andrews: >> Stephan, >>=20 >> Well, I had four "hits" last night: >>=20 >> 02:44 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:36 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:28 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:20 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA >>=20 >> That was in the time frame of a single OP32 transmission, and must have r= epresented a nice signal peak. >>=20 >> John, W1TAG/WD2XES >>=20 >> On 8/28/2012 10:11 PM, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>> Hi both, >>>=20 >>> Many thanks. It's 4:10 AM here now and i will take some sleep i think :-= ) >>>=20 >>> 73, Stefan >>>=20 >>> Am 29.08.2012 04:17, schrieb John Andrews: >>>> Stephan, >>>>=20 >>>> I just got home at 0200Z, and will leave the receiver running in OP8 >>>> overnight. >>>>=20 >>>> John, W1TAG >>>>=20 >>>> On 8/28/2012 8:01 PM, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >>>>> Jay, LF, >>>>>=20 >>>>> After finishing the next sequence in OP32 (hopefully reaching UA4WPF) i= >>>>> would like to try OP8 over to W1. Would you like to try? >>>>>=20 >>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >