Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 02F92380000B8; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 21:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SzHFD-0005mk-JY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:08:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SzHFD-0005mb-2h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:08:59 +0100 Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SzHFA-0004Q0-O1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:08:57 +0100 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so4774157obq.16 for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JB6MO9VkRK1fp4/LiNxiu8VKqmehqwzKdDGnM0mLpSU=; b=MoEmiQ/LeUnvItKKy6c9CyiAVn2zRY+Qt4J7+DRCCxx7y7uQ5xBGobFKEveP7CAAqw ZKBCL3wpHplLudG/gWqOA1boH0/2zTqPuYnGZmvKSFteeN2jxLC/AvzJikUEAj5Pkq/n zyqaixP738rf5ZNalDhM2gDUwSuSts11X5Ec3/UwzkBhrPCgMBjDo31UL7qr3P6y4HK6 ph3Ag4+AffkMIzlP38VBwaMUo7w9b5F6oFh+VvrcCcbfkT+WyZWhNXUL9m6WSXCPaWhV QCRTN7J/1U9hdJdN0XKdpMwH0peftX4kf0e0dUCARjtGCvtJhOVabV9T7YAb78INA4nw aziQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.17.42 with SMTP id l10mr2697316obd.52.1344474535100; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.39.10 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50230604.9040801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <5022E802.30404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50230604.9040801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:08:55 +1000 Message-ID: From: Dimitrios Tsifakis To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> Output impedance is about 1.4 ohm. I have designed it to produce 50 W >> at 12 V and of course 200 W at 24V. > > Yes, good idea. In /p for moderate power and at home in QRO :-) That's exactly the idea :-) Also, if all components are selectedfor a QRO operation, they will probably survive any kind of dodgy condition you may encounter in the field. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dtsifakis[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: Caps for Class-E amp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d50230de81441 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none >> Output impedance is about 1.4 ohm. I have designed it to produce 50 W >> at 12 V and of course 200 W at 24V. > > Yes, good idea. In /p for moderate power and at home in QRO :-) That's exactly the idea :-) Also, if all components are selectedfor a QRO operation, they will probably survive any kind of dodgy condition you may encounter in the field. >> I work in multiples of 12 V as I >> normally use big SLA batteries to power my equipment. The FET is a >> monster IXYS 500V/55A FET which should be bombproof. > > But you could have much lower on-resistances when using a 100V FET. 200W at > 24V is no problem though. IXYS is mostly a good choice. But quite expensive. > Once you lost a pair of them you begin to think to go back to the IRFP > types, at least i have done so ;-) I did not buy that FET, I was given it by a friend who bought it for a project but ended up not using it. The Rds(on) is 0.09 ohm, which is not that bad. Higher Rds(on) will result in a bit more heat on the heat sink and slightly less power for the same supply voltage, but no other serious side effect. The biggest problem with using a monster FET is the Ciss which is about 10 nF. This makes it a bit more difficult to drive than other smaller FETs, even at 137 kHz. But I found that the TC4420 (6 A peak) FET driver that I had in my junk box, seems to be happy with that Ciss/frequency combination. 73, Dimitris VK1SV