Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 73E0A3800009A; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:08:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Szase-000143-8E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:07:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Szasd-00013u-N8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:06:59 +0100 Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Szasb-0003ZP-Pc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:06:58 +0100 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so3120309obq.16 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:06:56 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XaMb1JZ2dzN7Qkl18q4hUBOkZcMD5FOp6BUhxvdq3wU=; b=CN7+Lz80dO1SAD2c0iH8z6T1DdxZCCGx0dK03v2FAfG21ysSWy31A3dicenlsz0MTS Bjh8Ahgf4eZsJ3V7eouh5LsDf6IMlu/7ouq1iArjEvewKLwFT12tEEusQ2ipCxhrPAWn 9ubTt5Q5SKJDMp+ASk4gu1D66/uEpR83eoc1K5eyU2JaEnXq37CoVMKIAKQtrji+/me6 L5ceyKtv30/JSXq5FiYWQdR1mtE8ubUB/DKR3Uzr2rK8Wxmjn5WzXeY2q3QKPaXFVGyT B91JgucbpLJyeDbUk7M2Ro9kQ8JGahfMJOQS7IWPVYenWMBKNH+shIES98Wa1suDUtai aFkA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.212.70 with SMTP id ni6mr1171371obc.44.1344550015932; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.39.10 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:06:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:06:55 +1000 Message-ID: From: Dimitrios Tsifakis To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Alan, I am also using a simulator, the free LTSPICE which seems to work OK, in fact I use it with wine under linux. With this, it is easy to predict the voltages that will develop across all components and you can also experiment with fine-tuning of the components. For example, in my design at 200 W output I get about 170 V peak to peak across C2. The waveform is very close to a sine wave, so that's about 60 V RMS. So I now have a number to use when evaluating caps against their datasheets. The voltage rating of these polypropylene pulse rated caps seems to depend on the capacitance for a given VDC max, so the final result will depend on what sort of caps I can get my hands on. The current seems to be about 33 A peak to peak (wow!), at 90 degrees behind the voltage. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dtsifakis[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 79aab7440207271f32757adc503f8c76 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Caps for Class-E amp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:495509568:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m008.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a502434c95090 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Alan, I am also using a simulator, the free LTSPICE which seems to work OK, in fact I use it with wine under linux. With this, it is easy to predict the voltages that will develop across all components and you can also experiment with fine-tuning of the components. For example, in my design at 200 W output I get about 170 V peak to peak across C2. The waveform is very close to a sine wave, so that's about 60 V RMS. So I now have a number to use when evaluating caps against their datasheets. The voltage rating of these polypropylene pulse rated caps seems to depend on the capacitance for a given VDC max, so the final result will depend on what sort of caps I can get my hands on. The current seems to be about 33 A peak to peak (wow!), at 90 degrees behind the voltage. Isn't simulation a great thing for those on a budget! :-) 73, Dimitris VK1SV 2012/8/9 Alan Melia : > Hi Dimitrios, yes those should do the job. I suppose that you need a > situation with paralleled caps where any one can carry the peak current. It > is probably a bit marginal if you really have to rely on current sharing in > this situation. I used up to 3 in parallel in the C2 position without > problems....I seem to remember the peak current was about 15 amp. I did a > simulation usig a switch mode power supply model. > Good Luck with it. > > Alan > G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitrios Tsifakis" > > To: > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:34 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Caps for Class-E amp > > > >> Hi Alan, >> >> thanks for the tip, I will keep an eye open for RIFA PHE428 or PHE450 >> which seems to be the newer version of that capacitor type. >> >> In my PA, I used two .1 uF caps in series to make .05 uF, then three >> of these in parallel to make .15 uF hoping that the currents will be >> distributed, however I think, once one of them gave up the ghost, the >> others immediatelly followed suit, so I ended up with one in every >> two-in-series capacitor being busted. >> >> By the way, that self-healing effect is quite useful if you ever want >> to create a bunch of lower value caps with non standard values :-) I >> now have a77 nF, 45 nF, 16 nF and even a 0.3 nF out of my .1 caps! I >> am kidding of course. :-) >> >> 73, Dimitris VK1SV >> >> 2012/8/9 Alan Melia : >>> >>> Hi Demitris, I am not sure of the types codes but I used 1000v or greater >>> rating, the problem often is that the caps are not rated for high pulse >>> currents. The best kind of caps that are used are rated for pulse >>> operation >>> in switch-mode power supply. Normal caps will not take the current >>> pulses.....the individual plates get disconnected from the lead wires. >>> One of the caps I used has come to hand its a RIFA PHE428 rated 2000v. I >>> used this on 36v Class E running about 300W. I believe WIMA make similar >>> caps but I am not sure of their type numbers. >>> >>> Alan >>> G3NYK >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitrios Tsifakis" >>> >>> To: >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:03 PM >>> Subject: LF: Caps for Class-E amp >>> >>> >>>> Hello LF group, >>>> >>>> I am building a 200 W Class-E transmitter for LF but keep killing the >>>> capacitors in the output circuit (both C1 and C2 according to the >>>> schematic in Sokal's QST article). I have used a mixture WIMA >>>> polypropylene MKP10, MKP4 and FKP1 caps and I haven't damaged any FKP >>>> ones so far. Should I not bother with MKP and use only FKP caps or is >>>> there any other type of capacitor what will do the job? I need a >>>> couple of hundred of nanofarads. The voltage rating of the caps I >>>> destroyed was 400 VDC or 250 VAC. I can see that these caps have a >>>> decreasing AC rating as the frequency goes up, but that's what I had >>>> in the junk box at the time... >>>> >>>> The mode of failure of these MKP10 0.1 400 VDC caps is interesting >>>> too, they seem to go down in capacitance as the damage progresses. >>>> >>>> Any advice is appreciated. >>>> >>>> 73, Dimitris VK1SV/SV1DET >>>> >>> >>> >> > >