Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AF51B38000084; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:35:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6rmF-00071J-AO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:34:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6rmE-00071A-T2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:34:26 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6rmD-0008WT-4D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:34:25 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7TNYOUk027999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:34:24 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7TNYO63002500 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:34:24 +0200 Message-ID: <503EA64C.4060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:31:24 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <503E98B6.6000300@charter.net> <503EA2EE.1040702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503EA718.2010301@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <503EA718.2010301@charter.net> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q7TNYOUk027999 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok John, now it gets confusing :-) Are there still monitoring stations or are we all on air, hi :-) Jay, what is your TX system? A omnidirectional antenna? We try to find traces in YV from you then... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: LF acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608b503ea739649e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Ok John, now it gets confusing :-) Are there still monitoring stations or are we all on air, hi :-) Jay, what is your TX system? A omnidirectional antenna? We try to find=20 traces in YV from you then... I lost the overview but never mind. Just let's all fire up what is=20 possible, just for the fun :-) 73, GD DX, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.08.2012 01:34, schrieb John Andrews: > Stephan, > > Actually, Jay was talking about transmitting OP8 also tonight. Not=20 > sure of his plans. I will run XES until well after your sunrise. > > John, W1TAG/WD2XES > > On 8/29/2012 7:17 PM, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> Hello John, Joe, LF, >> >> Wow, now there is much going on tonite again. Another time i don't kno= w >> if i should RX or TX and in which mode... >> I think i will not have a chance to decode W1TAG in OP8, however VO1NA >> in OP32 could be possible and would be my best rx-distance in OP. >> Furthermore i want to provide test signals for YV7MAE, so i'm now >> sending DFCW-90, after sending DFCW-180 to VK. >> >> John, will you transmit OP8 until the morning? Has Jay a chance to >> receive me in OP8 later or will you nearly overload his RX? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> PS: Our russian friends are doing a good job! Many stations, with good >> receivers and transmitters! >> >> >> Am 30.08.2012 00:33, schrieb John Andrews: >>> Forgot about the split Opera band for the two data rates. The actual >>> frequency tonight will be 137.621 kHz. Stick with 136.0 USB for a dia= l >>> setting. >>> >>> John, W1TAG/WD2XES >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/5231 - Release Date:=20 >> 08/28/12 18:42:00 >>