Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 70E6E3802B46D; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6rYL-0006m9-H4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:20:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6rYK-0006m0-Vb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:20:04 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6rYJ-0008QG-DM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:20:03 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7TNK2bD025987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:20:02 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7TNK28S002298 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: <503EA2EE.1040702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:17:02 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <503E98B6.6000300@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <503E98B6.6000300@charter.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello John, Joe, LF, Wow, now there is much going on tonite again. Another time i don't know if i should RX or TX and in which mode... I think i will not have a chance to decode W1TAG in OP8, however VO1NA in OP32 could be possible and would be my best rx-distance in OP. Furthermore i want to provide test signals for YV7MAE, so i'm now sending DFCW-90, after sending DFCW-180 to VK. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: LF: LF acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d6503ea55e3cf3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello John, Joe, LF, Wow, now there is much going on tonite again. Another time i don't know if i should RX or TX and in which mode... I think i will not have a chance to decode W1TAG in OP8, however VO1NA in OP32 could be possible and would be my best rx-distance in OP. Furthermore i want to provide test signals for YV7MAE, so i'm now sending DFCW-90, after sending DFCW-180 to VK. John, will you transmit OP8 until the morning? Has Jay a chance to receive me in OP8 later or will you nearly overload his RX? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Our russian friends are doing a good job! Many stations, with good receivers and transmitters! Am 30.08.2012 00:33, schrieb John Andrews: > Forgot about the split Opera band for the two data rates. The actual > frequency tonight will be 137.621 kHz. Stick with 136.0 USB for a dial > setting. > > John, W1TAG/WD2XES