Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8A31A38000397 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6l1A-0005De-AP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:21:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6l19-0005DV-R5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:21:23 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6l14-0005rI-Vc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:21:22 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7TGLIoM031067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:21:18 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7TGLH2G025782 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: <503E40CA.8060503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <503D5BDD.1030501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503D7BA9.7030404@charter.net> <503D7A4D.3030802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <503DF6D9.40003@charter.net> <503E00F4.50300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001101cd85ed$04b449c0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> In-Reply-To: <001101cd85ed$04b449c0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q7TGLIoM031067 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, A funny story. Would like to see a capture of the cat instead but this is OT. Or is it a special LF-cat, beeing able to decode OP8? :-) Last night, Martin/YV7MAE and me, we actually successfully saw a first effect of the E-H antenna combiner, using the circuit i recently published here. There was a 3 dB S/N rise/fall of the DCF-39 carrier when switching from front to back. We almost stopped to try to have some success with this hardware due to various problems. Now we must carefully learn how to adjust the pot for optimal noise reduction. Also we have to test if better results can be obtained when changing the loop resonance frequency. 3 dB is not much but it is a first interesting step and it allows to see what is NE and SW :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Subject: Re: LF: OP8 T/A? ...YV7... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da503e46d54aeb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Jay, A funny story. Would like to see a capture of the cat instead but this=20 is OT. Or is it a special LF-cat, beeing able to decode OP8? :-) Last night, Martin/YV7MAE and me, we actually successfully saw a first=20 effect of the E-H antenna combiner, using the circuit i recently=20 published here. There was a 3 dB S/N rise/fall of the DCF-39 carrier=20 when switching from front to back. We almost stopped to try to have some=20 success with this hardware due to various problems. Now we must=20 carefully learn how to adjust the pot for optimal noise reduction. Also=20 we have to test if better results can be obtained when changing the loop=20 resonance frequency. 3 dB is not much but it is a first interesting step=20 and it allows to see what is NE and SW :-) So this is why i want to try some DFCW-90 at night but i may switch to=20 OP8 automatically, somehow, late at night. We will see. 73 and tnx! Stefan Am 29.08.2012 15:48, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > > Good thing John was watching ... cat apparently spun the tuning dial=20 > and I didn't notice until morning. Cool nights now so the cats like to=20 > sleep on the warm receiver. Will engage dial brake next time ;~) > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer"=20 > > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:45 AM > Subject: Re: LF: OP8 T/A? > > > Hello John , > > OH! Good work, congrats to your receive equpiment! That is amazing. In > the first moment i thought there were no decodes in our test because no > red lines are shown in the pskmap. But later i found them in the text. > Many thanks for the test. It's nice to detect that peak of best > propagation, in 8 minute intervals. In a spectrogram it would work as > well of course... > So i still don't know if Jay got some results too? > > A summary of detections showing up here is attached (all T/A and the > highest S/N of the others) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 29.08.2012 13:02, schrieb John Andrews: >> Stephan, >> >> Well, I had four "hits" last night: >> >> 02:44 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:36 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:28 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -29 dB in Holden, MA USA >> 02:20 136 DK7FC de WD2XES Op8 3714 mi -30 dB in Holden, MA USA >> >> That was in the time frame of a single OP32 transmission, and must >> have represented a nice signal peak. >> >> John, W1TAG/WD2XES >> >> On 8/28/2012 10:11 PM, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >>> Hi both, >>> >>> Many thanks. It's 4:10 AM here now and i will take some sleep i think >>> :-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 29.08.2012 04:17, schrieb John Andrews: >>>> Stephan, >>>> >>>> I just got home at 0200Z, and will leave the receiver running in OP8 >>>> overnight. >>>> >>>> John, W1TAG >>>> >>>> On 8/28/2012 8:01 PM, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >>>>> Jay, LF, >>>>> >>>>> After finishing the next sequence in OP32 (hopefully reaching >>>>> UA4WPF) i >>>>> would like to try OP8 over to W1. Would you like to try? >>>>> >>>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >