Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 89DC738000095; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T3FXM-0003Kd-Dt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:08:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T3FXL-0003KU-Ua for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:08:07 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T3FXK-00061a-Ct for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:08:06 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7K085T9016553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:08:05 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7K085rZ005907 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:08:05 +0200 Message-ID: <50317F3B.3040507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 02:05:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <43B234D4D2CD41D788AE84B43C97002C@AGB> <50317773.4050903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 20.08.2012 01:49, schrieb Graham: > Condx improving Stefan ? No, maybe it was the first time i was listening and not transmitting :-) I am very often on air you know... > last night low signals all areas ? In OPera you cannot see if a low S/N is due to QRN or local QRM or poor conds or a combination of that. On a grabber you can see it :-) I think the conds have been "normal", what ever that is! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: LF: TF - W1 path - condx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d65031802a4631 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 20.08.2012 01:49, schrieb Graham: > Condx improving Stefan ? No, maybe it was the first time i was listening and not transmitting :-) I am very often on air you know... > last night low signals all areas ? In OPera you cannot see if a low S/N is due to QRN or local QRM or poor conds or a combination of that. On a grabber you can see it :-) I think the conds have been "normal", what ever that is! > no decodes on the west coast or into salt lake Still, W1TAG got 2 or 3 decodes of me. > > may be the TH3 path is a good indicator ? For what? For TA conds? No, as explained by Jay. I can confirm that. The path to TF is open almost any day of the year. When the band is open to W1, then the signals in TF are mostly 15...20 dB stronger. But not the other way arround. If the sun activity was high then the condx are poor and so the far QRN is not propagated. So the S/N in TF may be high (1 hop distance) but the path to W1 is closed. At least my observations over the time. Others may comment... 73, Stefan/DK7FC