Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8C895380000A6; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:29:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T2WtI-0003pH-G3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:27:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T2WtI-0003p8-3T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:27:48 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WtF-0008JG-Va for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:27:46 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7I0Rgnq032197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:27:42 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7I0RgAa007226 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:27:42 +0200 Message-ID: <502EE0D6.8050402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:24:54 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <502EA792.50108@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <502EA792.50108@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Wolf, Good luck! I can imagine that the average conds begin to improve on MF. Over the weekend a friend is here so i am not in QSO mode but soon i hope to hear you again. 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: MF activity tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4083502ee1e1226a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Wolf, Good luck! I can imagine that the average conds begin to improve on MF. Over the weekend a friend is here so i am not in QSO mode but soon i hope to hear you again. 73, Stefan Am 17.08.2012 22:20, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Greetings all, > > The 'Blitzortung' (lightning detector) map shows an almost complete > absence of lightning over western europe tonight: > > http://www.blitzortung.org/Webpages/index.php > > .. so I will try some CW activity around 472.5 kHz (+/- QRM) . > > As usual, I will also monitor 501 ... 503 kHz, and possibly try 80 > meter crossband, too. > > > 73, > Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD > JO42FD > 0.8 W ERP on MF > Ant: 60 meter "long" low wire > RX/TX (exciter): IC706 > PA: Linear, max 50 watts output. >