Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9801338000098; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T1PNP-0004a4-30 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:14:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T1PNO-0004Zo-Mr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:14:14 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T1PNM-0002yh-RJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:14:13 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7EMEBuG020769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:14:11 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7EMEBV7011328 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:14:11 +0200 Message-ID: <502ACD10.5060101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:11:28 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <9791FD3DF2054C099C478D988BD7D1B3@AGB> <502A42D4.9000009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK John, Sorry to hear about the CFH QRM. There will be several chances next of course! Tnx and 73, Stefan Am 14.08.2012 15:47, schrieb John Andrews: > Stephan, > > I tried, but CFH came up on 137 in the middle of your second run, and all hope was lost. Jay is 300 km farther from them than I am, and seems to be less bothered. > > John, W1TAG/1 > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: Re: LF: 136K OP 32 Activity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db407502acdff261e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK John, Sorry to hear about the CFH QRM. There will be several chances next of course! Tnx and 73, Stefan Am 14.08.2012 15:47, schrieb John Andrews: > Stephan, > > I tried, but CFH came up on 137 in the middle of your second run, and all hope was lost. Jay is 300 km farther from them than I am, and seems to be less bothered. > > John, W1TAG/1 >