Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 02A7F3800008C; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:43:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T0XUi-0006GY-FW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:42:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T0XUi-0006GP-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:42:12 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T0XUf-0001Ms-LR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:42:10 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7CCg87w008631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:42:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7CCg6bb023849 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:42:06 +0200 Message-ID: <5027A3FF.3020705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:39:27 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20120812103531.usf1rugu8wc4c48w@webmail.senselan.ch> In-Reply-To: <20120812103531.usf1rugu8wc4c48w@webmail.senselan.ch> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Toni, I checked my grabber capture archive and found your CQ calls arround 9 UTC but there was no trace of SQ7XQ. And i didn't see you in a QSO with someone. Do you talk about 137 kHz??? Can you show a capture? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: SQ7XQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41165027a4fd703b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Toni, I checked my grabber capture archive and found your CQ calls arround 9 UTC but there was no trace of SQ7XQ. And i didn't see you in a QSO with someone. Do you talk about 137 kHz??? Can you show a capture? 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: First QRSS signals of DF2JP on 137.643 kHz in QRSS-10, right now. http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_Grabber.html Am 12.08.2012 10:35, schrieb traumwandler@sensemail.ch: > Nice signal from Piotr this sunday morning. His QRSS is very strong and even > audible. > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB, JN36nu > >