Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D94F43800008A; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:21:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T0J6U-000140-Vt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:20:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T0J6U-00013r-JQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:20:14 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T0J6T-0005dG-35 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:20:13 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7BLKCmW010405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:20:12 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q7BLKC7x006808 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <5026CBEC.4000803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:17:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello US LF stns, Martin/YV7MAE turned his antenna towards N/S because he attempts to receive traces of LU1DOW in 5000km how is running QRO into a decent antenna that night. We checked the performance of the new loop and it actually adds some dB S/N compared to the E field antenna which has to fight with heavy QRN from everywhere in that region. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: LF: YV antenna to N/S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40825026ccc25df5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello US LF stns, Martin/YV7MAE turned his antenna towards N/S because he attempts to receive traces of LU1DOW in 5000km how is running QRO into a decent antenna that night. We checked the performance of the new loop and it actually adds some dB S/N compared to the E field antenna which has to fight with heavy QRN from everywhere in that region. So this would be a good change for the east coast stations to leave a first trace in a new continent. As far as i know VO1NA and WD2XKO are the only ones except me so far... Will someone be on the air? 73, Stefan/DK7FC