Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EF45538000087; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SzTnR-0007Sm-8x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:33:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SzTnQ-0007Sd-S5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:33:08 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTnO-0008C4-T2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:33:07 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q79EX6td001087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:33:06 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q79EX5jW001346 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:33:05 +0200 Message-ID: <5023C984.3010108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:30:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5023BF9B.2040903@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5023C846.6040803@dsl.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <5023C846.6040803@dsl.pipex.com> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q79EX6td001087 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Chris, And sorry, my VLF grabber list was incomplete. Now updated. The traces are very clear on your grabber. Impressing. The last two step frequencies are somehow blurred. A detailed reprocessing of this time segment would be interesting but i do not take permanent recordings... Maybe they shot the TX, hi. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: VLF staircase, once again Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40565023ca597df8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Chris, And sorry, my VLF grabber list was incomplete. Now updated. The traces are very clear on your grabber. Impressing. The last two step=20 frequencies are somehow blurred. A detailed reprocessing of this time=20 segment would be interesting but i do not take permanent recordings...=20 Maybe they shot the TX, hi. 73, Stefan Am 09.08.2012 16:25, schrieb Chris Dillon: > Hi Stefan - two very strong staircases linking the three Alpha=20 > frequencies also on my grabber http://g3wcd.bplaced.net. GBZ also went=20 > off the air for a few hours this morning although it's back on now. > Quite a lot of activity at the moment around 82Hz. > > 73 Chris G3WCD > > On 09/08/2012 14:48, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> VLF, >> >> There was a "staircase" again from 12...15 kHz with a very strong=20 >> signal again! >> Unfortunately the OK2BVG grabber just stopped a few hours before=20 >> that. There are not many active VLF grabbers these days. >> The signal was visible at >> >> http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/vlfgrabber.htm >> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> >