Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A8E6B3800008C; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:39:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SzGmD-0005eJ-L5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:39:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SzGmD-0005eA-7b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:39:01 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SzGmA-0004LB-Ot for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:39:00 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q790cvOe001945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 02:38:58 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q790cvXB010160 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 02:38:57 +0200 Message-ID: <50230604.9040801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 02:36:20 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5022E802.30404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 09.08.2012 02:24, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > > What is the VDC rating of the FKP1 caps in your 1 kW PA? > It is a mixture because i had only a few pieces on hand. If i remember correctly the lowest DC voltage is 1.25 kV. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: Caps for Class-E amp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4109502306d23147 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 09.08.2012 02:24, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > > What is the VDC rating of the FKP1 caps in your 1 kW PA? > It is a mixture because i had only a few pieces on hand. If i remember correctly the lowest DC voltage is 1.25 kV. > > Output impedance is about 1.4 ohm. I have designed it to produce 50 W > at 12 V and of course 200 W at 24V. Yes, good idea. In /p for moderate power and at home in QRO :-) > I work in multiples of 12 V as I > normally use big SLA batteries to power my equipment. The FET is a > monster IXYS 500V/55A FET which should be bombproof. But you could have much lower on-resistances when using a 100V FET. 200W at 24V is no problem though. IXYS is mostly a good choice. But quite expensive. Once you lost a pair of them you begin to think to go back to the IRFP types, at least i have done so ;-) > I do know that things are probably simpler if I select a higher > voltage supply as that will increase the output impedance and make > life a bit easier on the poor capacitors. But I do want to be able to > operate it out in the field and not carry half a truck worth of > batteries :-) > :-) I can fully understand that. In my first Lf /p experiments i used this 1 kW PA and run it on 12V or 24V or 36V, using batteries in series. But it should be no problem to get a good efficiency even at 12V DC, at least for a 100W PA. > In any case, I don't want to go more than 200 W as I am scared of the > voltage developed across my loading coil (currently about 12 mH or ~10 > kohm XL). > > 73, Dimitris VK1SV/SV1DET > 73, Stefan/DK7FC