Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6E5F23800048A; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:18:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SwhF0-00064L-L8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:18:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SwhF0-000643-6B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:18:06 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SwhEy-0001u9-FE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:18:04 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q71MI3vY026341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 00:18:03 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q71MI3w0029634 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 00:18:03 +0200 Message-ID: <5019AA86.4000907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:15:34 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002401cd701c$b93cfef0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5B3AEBCE6DFE487090EB6ED2DF0D7D4E@AGB> In-Reply-To: <5B3AEBCE6DFE487090EB6ED2DF0D7D4E@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Probably the problem was just QRN? 73, Stefan Am 02.08.2012 00:12, schrieb Graham: > Something has to be slightly wrong there Mal > What is the CPU meter showing during the decode period , if its > flicking into the RED or 80%/90% , that would indicate , a > possible problem , Opera and ROS data modes have a 'high' > cpu load , due to the volume of data processing > Other is to ensure the audio falls 'inside' the red lines on > the w/fall > No problem TX as this is a simple low cpu load process > 73 - G > > *From:* mal hamilton > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:34 PM > *To:* rsgb > *Subject:* LF: Opera 137.6 > > LF > Old story----- someone active on 137.6 opera but no decode, had it > been QRSS I could probably get an ID > de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: Re: LF: Opera 137.6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020002070808040103080405" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:453270560:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d75019ab4d1029 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020002070808040103080405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Probably the problem was just QRN? 73, Stefan Am 02.08.2012 00:12, schrieb Graham: > Something has to be slightly wrong there Mal > What is the CPU meter showing during the decode period , if its > flicking into the RED or 80%/90% , that would indicate , a > possible problem , Opera and ROS data modes have a 'high' > cpu load , due to the volume of data processing > Other is to ensure the audio falls 'inside' the red lines on > the w/fall > No problem TX as this is a simple low cpu load process > 73 - G > > *From:* mal hamilton > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:34 PM > *To:* rsgb > *Subject:* LF: Opera 137.6 > > LF > Old story----- someone active on 137.6 opera but no decode, had it > been QRSS I could probably get an ID > de mal/g3kev --------------020002070808040103080405 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Probably the problem was just QRN?

73, Stefan

Am 02.08.2012 00:12, schrieb Graham:
Something  has to  be  slightly   wrong  there  Mal
 
What is the  CPU meter  showing  during the  decode  period , if its  flicking  into the  RED or  80%/90%  , that  would  indicate  , a possible  problem  , Opera  and  ROS data  modes  have  a  'high'   cpu  load , due to the  volume  of  data  processing 
 
Other  is to  ensure the  audio  falls  'inside'  the  red lines  on the  w/fall 
 
No problem  TX as  this  is  a  simple  low   cpu  load  process 
 
73 - G

Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:34 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: Opera 137.6

LF
Old story----- someone active on 137.6 opera but no decode, had it been QRSS I could probably get an ID
de mal/g3kev
 
--------------020002070808040103080405--