Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F320E380000B1; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T66Pp-0001OL-4o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:00:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T66Po-0001OC-NQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:00:08 +0100 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T66Pm-0003eV-EK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:00:07 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.12]) by mwinf5d67 with ME id rx021j00D0FmMWi03x02bY; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:00:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1FE1FE833E5B4BE3B69CF694125D1E45@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <06DDBDA2FE814440A956B5C33365FB75@AGB>, <003501cd8452$4ce82780$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <37060B46D79F4AC69EEDBDA79B6B00CC@AGB> <503B869B.13523.54A81E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <503BD689.2030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <503BD689.2030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:00:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, Unfortunately as of yet , there is no central data server and as observed, the odd spot manages to escape the system , akin to a ad-hoc wireless network ... local records are valid of course Apparently a on line data base is not a big job , for someone who is in that line .. however as yet that someone has yet to be found :( [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf503be0233c44 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan, Unfortunately as of yet , there is no central data server and as observed, the odd spot manages to escape the system , akin to a ad-hoc wireless network ... local records are valid of course Apparently a on line data base is not a big job , for someone who is in that line .. however as yet that someone has yet to be found :( G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 9:20 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes > Hm, somehow my initial question and observation was completely ignored... > > I also remember that W1TAG reported about 2 decodes in one night while i > only saw one! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > Am 27.08.2012 20:11, schrieb Graham: >> Yes only go's to show , >> >> One Guy's ''Pixel'' is another's ''Nibble'' >> >> - have to keep in mid, Op is a one-pass data mode , the decode over >> heads are significant compared to 'carrier detection' - >> >> But as Stefan has commented , the number of stations active on 136 >> tx/rx is definitely on the increase, where as the PSK map >> used to show the odd red spot , now its quite packed ! >> >> G :) >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Mike Dennison" >> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 2:39 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: Re: OP missed decodes >> >>> On 27 Aug 2012 at 14:08, Graham wrote: >>> >>>> Interesting , is Op visible at -40 dB ? , >>> >>> Oh yes! I have done some tests with TF3HZ's grabber and I can see my >>> Op32 on a QRSS screen when he was decoding at very low levels. >>> However, there is not much in it and Opera is very impressive in >>> resolving weak signals. >>> >>> For beacon and propagation tests Opera reports are so much more >>> convenient than taking snapshots of images of a QRSS grabber screen. >>> For a QSO, QRSS/DFCW may well be more useful, but the path conditions >>> can be more easily determined using Opera. It is "horses for >>> courses". >>> >>> Mike, G3XDV >>> ========== >>> >