Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 21AAD380032E7; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:14:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6nEU-0005mL-S0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:43:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6nEU-0005mC-5c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:43:18 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6nEP-0006Y6-3h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:43:17 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAKAF5hPlBOk866/2dsb2JhbABFuXgDd4EIghsFAQEFCAEBAxovAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBiAAHrRuOdIsIFYEGhT4DiBqFQpgPgmOBWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,335,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="401911942" Received: from host-78-147-206-186.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.206.186]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 29 Aug 2012 19:43:11 +0100 Message-ID: <00b601cd8616$21941dd0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <006c01cd85fd$410bb9c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <503E4333.5070808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00ac01cd8614$0bc80c20$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:43:07 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan I do not think the TF grabber is as sensitive as it used to be. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:28 PM Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 [...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.238 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.9 FSL_UA FSL_UA 2.1 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fa743f59d022704fe4104ed922c6083c Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CD8616.215AE560" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608e503e69f80343 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CD8616.215AE560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan I do not think the TF grabber is as sensitive as it used to be. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 6:28 PM Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 Stefan I am always in the shack when Transmitting looking for a reply either = on my frequency or a QSX freq. This has always worked in the past with = TA stations or Russian stns calling me normally on 7033 Khz. I could = stay up late but YV7MAE would need to indicate that if he heard/seen my = signal he would call on an agreed HF freq or LF/MF etc I prefer a report via radio rather than via internet. My QRS limit is = normally QRS 60 or faster but not slower. I am sure if I persist I could be heard/seen in YV and I was on 40 = metres a few nights ago and worked some S/American on CW so it would be = easy to have a xband QSO I am using a single element QUAD on 40 metres max sig N/S so no = problem for a N/S QSO 73 tnx info de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:28 PM Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 Hi Mal,=20 It would be helpful for YV7MAE if you provide a strong signal at = night, on that QRG. Your QTH is somewhat more noth from mine so Martin = can turn the loop a bit more CCW, which significantly reduces the QRN = coming from Africa. He has now the chance to reduce the QRN coming from = South-South-America. BTW you could make the first UK -> South America = detection ever (if i'm informed correctly). His grabber is at = http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html However, the band opens not before 23 UTC, so it would be a long = night if you can't run the TX while sleeping.=20 Distance between you both would be 7302km. See the path, it's almost = only water: http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DFK81BD&from=3Dio94sh There are more and better chances in the coming months, anyway, an = exciting challenge, isn't it? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.08.2012 17:45, schrieb mal hamilton:=20 Stefan es co Fired up on 136.173 signal almost 20dB avove noise on ur grabber 73 mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CD8616.215AE560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
I do not think the TF grabber is as sensitive as = it used=20 to be.
mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 mal=20 hamilton
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, = 2012 6:28=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 136.173

Stefan
I am always in the shack when Transmitting = looking for a=20 reply either on my frequency or a QSX freq. This has always worked in = the past=20 with TA stations or Russian stns calling me normally on 7033 Khz. I = could stay=20 up late but YV7MAE would need to indicate that if he heard/seen my = signal he=20 would call on an agreed HF freq or LF/MF etc
I prefer a report via radio rather than via = internet. My=20 QRS limit is normally QRS 60 or faster but not slower.
I am sure if I persist I could be heard/seen = in YV and I=20 was on 40 metres a few nights ago and worked some S/American on CW so = it would=20 be easy to have a xband QSO
I am using a single element QUAD on 40 metres = max sig=20 N/S so no problem for a N/S QSO
73 tnx info
de mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer=20
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, = 2012 4:28=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: = 136.173

Hi Mal,

It would be helpful for YV7MAE if you = provide=20 a strong signal at night, on that QRG. Your QTH is somewhat more = noth from=20 mine so Martin can turn the loop a bit more CCW, which significantly = reduces=20 the QRN coming from Africa. He has now the chance to reduce the QRN = coming=20 from South-South-America. BTW you could make the first UK -> = South=20 America detection ever (if i'm informed correctly).
His grabber = is at http:= //dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html
However,=20 the band opens not before 23 UTC, so it would be a long night if you = can't=20 run the TX while sleeping.
Distance between you both would be = 7302km.=20 See the path, it's almost only water: htt= p://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DFK81BD&from=3Dio94sh
There=20 are more and better chances in the coming months, anyway, an = exciting=20 challenge, isn't it? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am=20 29.08.2012 17:45, schrieb mal hamilton:=20
Stefan es co
Fired up on 136.173 signal almost 20dB = avove noise=20 on ur grabber
73 mal/g3kev
=
 
------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CD8616.215AE560--