Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB2B638000424; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:59:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T6n08-0005f3-Ew for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:28:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T6n07-0005eu-U8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:28:27 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T6n05-0006UX-K9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:28:26 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAKABdfPlBOk866/2dsb2JhbABFuXgDd4EIghsFAQEFCAEBAxovAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBiAAHrR+OdIsIFYEGhT4DiBqFQpgPgmOBWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,335,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="401910632" Received: from host-78-147-206-186.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.206.186]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 29 Aug 2012 19:28:16 +0100 Message-ID: <00ac01cd8614$0bc80c20$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <006c01cd85fd$410bb9c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <503E4333.5070808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:28:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan I am always in the shack when Transmitting looking for a reply either on my frequency or a QSX freq. This has always worked in the past with TA stations or Russian stns calling me normally on 7033 Khz. I could stay up late but YV7MAE would need to indicate that if he heard/seen my signal he would call on an agreed HF freq or LF/MF etc I prefer a report via radio rather than via internet. My QRS limit is normally QRS 60 or faster but not slower. I am sure if I persist I could be heard/seen in YV and I was on 40 metres a few nights ago and worked some S/American on CW so it would be easy to have a xband QSO I am using a single element QUAD on 40 metres max sig N/S so no problem for a N/S QSO 73 tnx info de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.238 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.9 FSL_UA FSL_UA 2.1 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fb42d311bf65eb51bbb8124890b4f977 Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A9_01CD8614.0B8C62B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604d503e66794e97 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01CD8614.0B8C62B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan I am always in the shack when Transmitting looking for a reply either on = my frequency or a QSX freq. This has always worked in the past with TA = stations or Russian stns calling me normally on 7033 Khz. I could stay = up late but YV7MAE would need to indicate that if he heard/seen my = signal he would call on an agreed HF freq or LF/MF etc I prefer a report via radio rather than via internet. My QRS limit is = normally QRS 60 or faster but not slower. I am sure if I persist I could be heard/seen in YV and I was on 40 = metres a few nights ago and worked some S/American on CW so it would be = easy to have a xband QSO I am using a single element QUAD on 40 metres max sig N/S so no problem = for a N/S QSO 73 tnx info de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:28 PM Subject: Re: LF: 136.173 Hi Mal,=20 It would be helpful for YV7MAE if you provide a strong signal at = night, on that QRG. Your QTH is somewhat more noth from mine so Martin = can turn the loop a bit more CCW, which significantly reduces the QRN = coming from Africa. He has now the chance to reduce the QRN coming from = South-South-America. BTW you could make the first UK -> South America = detection ever (if i'm informed correctly). His grabber is at = http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html However, the band opens not before 23 UTC, so it would be a long night = if you can't run the TX while sleeping.=20 Distance between you both would be 7302km. See the path, it's almost = only water: http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DFK81BD&from=3Dio94sh There are more and better chances in the coming months, anyway, an = exciting challenge, isn't it? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.08.2012 17:45, schrieb mal hamilton:=20 Stefan es co Fired up on 136.173 signal almost 20dB avove noise on ur grabber 73 mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01CD8614.0B8C62B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
I am always in the shack when Transmitting = looking for a=20 reply either on my frequency or a QSX freq. This has always worked in = the past=20 with TA stations or Russian stns calling me normally on 7033 Khz. I = could stay=20 up late but YV7MAE would need to indicate that if he heard/seen my = signal he=20 would call on an agreed HF freq or LF/MF etc
I prefer a report via radio rather than via = internet. My=20 QRS limit is normally QRS 60 or faster but not slower.
I am sure if I persist I could be heard/seen in = YV and I=20 was on 40 metres a few nights ago and worked some S/American on CW so it = would=20 be easy to have a xband QSO
I am using a single element QUAD on 40 metres = max sig N/S=20 so no problem for a N/S QSO
73 tnx info
de mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, = 2012 4:28=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 136.173

Hi Mal,

It would be helpful for YV7MAE if you = provide a=20 strong signal at night, on that QRG. Your QTH is somewhat more noth = from mine=20 so Martin can turn the loop a bit more CCW, which significantly = reduces the=20 QRN coming from Africa. He has now the chance to reduce the QRN coming = from=20 South-South-America. BTW you could make the first UK -> South = America=20 detection ever (if i'm informed correctly).
His grabber is at http:= //dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html
However,=20 the band opens not before 23 UTC, so it would be a long night if you = can't run=20 the TX while sleeping.
Distance between you both would be 7302km. = See the=20 path, it's almost only water: htt= p://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DFK81BD&from=3Dio94sh
There=20 are more and better chances in the coming months, anyway, an exciting=20 challenge, isn't it? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am = 29.08.2012=20 17:45, schrieb mal hamilton:=20
Stefan es co
Fired up on 136.173 signal almost 20dB avove = noise on=20 ur grabber
73 mal/g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01CD8614.0B8C62B0--