Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 64BE63800008C; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 04:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SwqQ6-00009b-FO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:06:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SwqQ5-00009S-R5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:06:09 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqQ2-0004Ei-GD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:06:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIKAEA0GlBcF/Tg/2dsb2JhbABFon6VDAN/gQiCGwUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdtAxC0HwuJUItJgSOCRYMcA4gYhUGXe4Jf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,699,1336345200"; d="scan'208,217";a="546831232" Received: from host-92-23-244-224.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.244.224]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 02 Aug 2012 09:06:04 +0100 Message-ID: <003101cd7085$a4d7a690$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <002401cd701c$b93cfef0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5B3AEBCE6DFE487090EB6ED2DF0D7D4E@AGB> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:05:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham The signal on waterfall was vy weak on/off like Opera but did not decode and was within the Tram lines. (I remember the Trams in Liverpool in the late 1950's. I used to travel frequently betweem Belfast and Liverpool and beyond in those days !!) The signal was vy weak, too much for Opera to decode but possible ok for QRSS ID Will have another bash on 136 sometime but like to be around when TXing and don't want to sit up all night even the DX is attractive 73 de Mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 FSL_UA FSL_UA 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fb42d311bf65eb51bbb8124890b4f977 Subject: Re: LF: Opera 137.6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01CD7085.A46535B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:485598816:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db408501a352b12e8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CD7085.A46535B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Graham The signal on waterfall was vy weak on/off like Opera but did not decode = and was within the Tram lines. (I remember the Trams in Liverpool in the = late 1950's. I used to travel frequently betweem Belfast and Liverpool = and beyond in those days !!) The signal was vy weak, too much for Opera to decode but possible ok = for QRSS ID Will have another bash on 136 sometime but like to be around when TXing = and don't want to sit up all night even the DX is attractive=20 73 de Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:12 PM Subject: Re: LF: Opera 137.6 Something has to be slightly wrong there Mal=20 What is the CPU meter showing during the decode period , if its = flicking into the RED or 80%/90% , that would indicate , a = possible problem , Opera and ROS data modes have a 'high' cpu = load , due to the volume of data processing =20 Other is to ensure the audio falls 'inside' the red lines on = the w/fall =20 No problem TX as this is a simple low cpu load process =20 73 - G From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:34 PM To: rsgb=20 Subject: LF: Opera 137.6 LF Old story----- someone active on 137.6 opera but no decode, had it = been QRSS I could probably get an ID de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CD7085.A46535B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Graham
The signal on waterfall was vy weak on/off like = Opera but=20 did not decode and was within the Tram lines. (I remember the Trams in = Liverpool=20 in the late 1950's. I used to travel frequently betweem Belfast and = Liverpool=20 and beyond in those days !!)
The signal was vy  weak, too much for = Opera to=20 decode but possible ok for QRSS ID
Will have another bash on 136 sometime but like = to be=20 around when TXing and don't want to sit up all night even the DX is = attractive=20
73 de Mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Graham
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, = 2012 10:12=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Opera = 137.6

Something  has to  be  slightly   = wrong =20 there  Mal
 
What is the  CPU meter  showing  during the =20 decode  period , if its  flicking  into the  RED = or =20 80%/90%  , that  would  indicate  , a = possible =20 problem  , Opera  and  ROS data  modes  = have =20 a  'high'   cpu  load , due to the  = volume =20 of  data  processing 
 
Other  is to  ensure the  audio  falls =20 'inside'  the  red lines  on the  w/fall  =
 
No problem  TX as  this  is  a  = simple =20 low   cpu  load  process 
 
73 - G

From: mal hamilton
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:34 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: Opera 137.6

LF
Old story----- someone active on 137.6 opera = but no=20 decode, had it been QRSS I could probably get an ID
de mal/g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CD7085.A46535B0--