Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9C6DC38000091; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:43:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T4xe6-0005e7-JE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:26:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T4xe5-0005dy-DO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:26:09 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T4xe3-0005pj-9j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:26:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjAUAA2sN1BcHYwG/2dsb2JhbAA7CooxrkB1AQJ6gQiCGwUBAQQBCAEBA0kCDxcGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGCgkKAQICAQGHbQMGCq9zBYlWiwgQCm0Lc0OESQOIGoVCmA2CY4Fh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,304,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="391667693" Received: from host-92-29-140-6.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.140.6]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 2012 18:26:04 +0100 Message-ID: <002101cd821d$88efece0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <009801cd8141$def30be0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1345747032.3527.17.camel@gerhard-desktop> <40000788-DB4D-4EA3-BD0E-72DB5DF07CBB@dk8kw.de> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:26:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Geri Tnx for the info. I had an idea of the system as you describe but was not sure of the frequencies involved. When it rains around here the ground is very colourful and I often wondered if I was sitting on an oil well. I will soon find out !! at no cost to me. [...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.241 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.9 FSL_UA FSL_UA 2.1 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: gas es oil cales Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_COST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40855037bd5e6bd4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Geri Tnx for the info. I had an idea of the system as you describe but was not sure of the frequencies involved. When it rains around here the ground is very colourful and I often wondered if I was sitting on an oil well. I will soon find out !! at no cost to me. de Mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Holger 'Geri' DK8KW DI2BO W1KW" To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:44 PM Subject: Re: LF: gas es oil cales Mal and all, By profession I am probably one of the competent people to reply, I am a Petroleum and Drilling Engineer working in the service sector of the oil and gas industry. Regarding the cables I can confirm what Gerhard mentions in his mail below, these geophones pick up reflections from artificially created noise, mostly from explosions or also from vibrating trucks on the surface. There is, however, the use of VLF in drilling operations. There is a sort of Measurement While Drilling technology, which uses low frequency currents to transmit data from the drill bit some several thousand meters below the surface to the surface. those systems are called EM-MWD, which means electro-magnetic, however, is is more an AC modulated DC current that is used to identify and demodulate the data. Frequencies here are in the hundreds of Hertz range, and, hence, should not be any trouble to our VLF/LF/MF activities. Also, there are systems used for what we call borehole logging, which are sensors that are used in boreholes to determine the formation properties, that use frequencies of several hundred kHz, equal to LF or MF. Those are, however, injected into the formation way below the surface and we might only be able to detect those if a drilling rig is very close to our homes (not completely unlikely because several geothermal drilling activities are carried out directly in cities and populate areas these days). I know, however, from tests we (my company) carried out back in the 80ties, that those signals are attenuated some 200 db (!) on their way from the borehole bottom to the surface. Vy 73 Geri, DK8KW & DI2BO P.S.: Gerhard, where do you live? I assume the seismic activities near your home are carried out for OMV? It's one of my clients and I am in Vienna around twice a month. On 23.08.2012, at 20:37, Gerhard Hickl wrote: > Hi Mal! > > I live in an area (very Eastern part of Austria) which has GAS/OIL > resources. During the past two decades, it was common here to search for > new sources with the method you described. > > As far as I know, those cables aren't carrying any kind of signal, but > rather they are used to transfer signals detected by probes > (microphones) to a central data-processing station. > > The sources of this "noise" detected by the probes could be either > explosive loads, detonated in drilled holes up to some hundreds of > meters in depth, or vibrations generated by special machines. Those > machines are kind of Caterpillars with a big vibrating metal plate at > the bottom which is transferring mechanical vibrations into the ground. > > From the radiation patterns, picked up by the many probes (microphones) > which are connected via a mesh of cables, geologists can tell about the > position of a undiscovered potential Oil/Gas - field. > > So as far as I know and have experienced, there is no threat to our > activities. > > 73 > OE3GHB > Gerhard > > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 23.08.2012, 15:13 +0000 schrieb mal hamilton: >> LF/MF >> Seemingly some cables are being layed through out some parts of the UK >> for GAS es OIL exploration. These cables will will carry a signal to >> penetrate the earth and detect if gas/oil is below. There will also be >> some small explosive charges at times in the earth and these will be >> detected also by the cable and fed to a master station. >> Does anyone know what frequency is transmitted down these cables or >> mode of transmission PULSE etc >> This could be a source of QRM for the LF/MF radio amateur and most >> people do not know it is taking place and wondering where the QRM is >> coming from. >> There will be a network of cables for hundreds of miles lying on >> fields and ditches etc while the exploration is going on >> >> >> de mal/g3kev >> > > >