Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4BC0638000088; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sr9tf-0006Xn-C2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:41:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sr9tf-0006Xe-0O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:41:11 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.30]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr9td-0002bP-GL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:41:09 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6HFf2sa048262 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:41:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F54B686CBDD4096901F642791F2E253@gnat> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:41:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F54B686CBDD4096901F642791F2E253@gnat> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Alan (G3NYK), Looking at the Kyoto website and my NAVTEX log on 518 kHz, there is clearly a strong correlation between Dst values around 0 and good T/A reception. I wonder if a significant drop in the Dst value is followed by an immediate change in propagation, or that there is some time lag? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.30 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: LF: Kyoto Dst question Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:380955136:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604c500587d05aec X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Alan (G3NYK), Looking at the Kyoto website and my NAVTEX log on 518 kHz, there is clearly a strong correlation between Dst values around 0 and good T/A reception. I wonder if a significant drop in the Dst value is followed by an immediate change in propagation, or that there is some time lag? 73, Roelof, pa0rdt