Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 87256380001DE; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SlTfV-0008Ar-Un for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:35:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SlTfV-0008Ai-JX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:35:05 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SlTfT-0006xf-FA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:35:04 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q61NZ0Nd013359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 21:05:00 -0230 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 21:05:00 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4FF05DB2.2040108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <201207010932.51099.smtp01@email.it> <1EDE9267-42CA-4EE5-ABE6-1A4A3A9EAF57@arimi.it> <4FF03335.5040803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <2435D897-F460-45BD-87A8-674A8FF34D74@arimi.it> <4FF05DB2.2040108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MUN-Disclaimer: http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/elect_communications_disclaimer_2012.php X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Group, Other than an XX in CW which I thought I heard, there was little else other than the usual VLF FSK stations heard here in eastern Canada. 73 Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: Re: VLF: SAQ afternoon transmission Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:492418656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61864ff0dee93fc1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Group, Other than an XX in CW which I thought I heard, there was little else other than the usual VLF FSK stations heard here in eastern Canada. 73 Joe VO1NA This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php