Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 33DFD3800008C; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:48:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SrEnt-0008Oz-2I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:55:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SrEns-0008Oq-G9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:55:32 +0100 Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.68]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrEnq-0004PA-Mb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:55:31 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.56] by nm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jul 2012 20:55:29 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jul 2012 20:55:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jul 2012 20:55:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 227462.93479.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15314 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2012 20:55:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=026Udxm5MxZlc4se83WroA1x0/G3CoDIwtQqdbNAde+XT6icz2aasoxoZLyzcydMx+5Y6Bcv+pOYViry1avqAJLxVCZlicOjEMhSQMmCn20qyTUiJAt2F0G0Rjus7lzIPnvURJPDX8pIddCn73I2vHdcuTU9jMKZ4tx5fxjz2+Y= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1342558529; bh=FmlYK8cWzc+2Z2Gx3eCW00sW3K6XBSbuQKSuusCk+PQ=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=IXcvCuMblWyUaFLAKJPNPwA2O+0ZTFnYvUncPtb8U3hh8Ya6KeZPmCq7Tnc+0Qi2o2gD/Z1YbFP1XmypNb4/fGBGr/tfB8HVOQDGc5WI+1hBXzTao3slI0/2ca8LOZ9l/ExRzxTTsH7BBexkRWjEgKJvVN2P09E4/7sx66Y3DYc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kDvd.pcVM1lATBw8pM_Uf7y8yxtetVKaoM6dZZpcQcfkV37 CfoPtPyXAHGcSk7EV0ALRI5PGqJUi8nArN2DInkoYHpHID_m4dduPs.dy8Ao tXE9X3s77MKTZ9n8ME0sUB1iua5zYLtIWrCaAu0EoBp_wLhKBV0xktNG.eH_ cJ9iG5u6ZzNqtD4WpQ3TOFqMW0Rt18TYXgN_gL0jLayPyzF6eY6Yw1EP7AO7 EHsciKjWipwnJz9lOFc4KVNiN_qfgABJy972NL10LPYzwm2.QwRCrkdE6zcQ 8JOTseUUSMbXOeXDlrAo.DOhZM6MwIld0qXlVAvtqub.tK_uhx1FfTt_HcC7 lWAbGgQ991zLuNE1I3jtEC9MSm9SxnxTCVcHFoLNLpzvvAS42.JAnSwJyc3T uEqbkErgac0Lo4Rvpngc- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@86.128.171.80 with login) by smtp826.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2012 13:55:29 -0700 PDT Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4F54B686CBDD4096901F642791F2E253@gnat> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:55:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120717-0, 17/07/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roelof thanks for your observations. It is great to get information from different frequencies and different paths. I looked at NDBs but could not think of a reliable way of automatically monitoring signals. I was worried about the shared frequency problem.....knowing what I was listening to. I started monitoring CFH on 137khz when it was on continuously. when it went off. I transfered to trying SXV but could not make sense of it. Brian Rogerson CT1DRP took up the challenge and collected signal from DCF39 24/7 for about 4 years. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: Re: Kyoto Dst question Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:493678272:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m236.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f5006f6ea6857 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Roelof thanks for your observations. It is great to get information from different frequencies and different paths. I looked at NDBs but could not think of a reliable way of automatically monitoring signals. I was worried about the shared frequency problem.....knowing what I was listening to. I started monitoring CFH on 137khz when it was on continuously. when it went off. I transfered to trying SXV but could not make sense of it. Brian Rogerson CT1DRP took up the challenge and collected signal from DCF39 24/7 for about 4 years. What might be interesting if you could classify the path length of different paths (It depends whether you can find sufficient at the right range) It would be interesting to try and correlate the excess path loss against "hop number". I feel that if 1 hop has 6dB excess attenuation, a 3 hop path (5000 to 6000 km) should show around 18dB An interesting aside I spotted might be of interest to you. It regards daytime skywave so a path of about 1200 to 1400km. I found that the "precipitated" hot electrons from a big event were sufficient to give a kind of prolonged "flare effect". The increased signal during a flare event is due to he increased D-region ionisation. Similarly the increased ionisation due to precipitation can enhance the daytime skywave signals. The reports I have seen suggest the signals are most clearly enhanced around mid day at mid path. The effect is often only present for about one or at most two days after an event. Great stuff this LF :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:43 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Kyoto Dst question > Hello Alan, > > Thank you very much indeed for your explanation. > I have now a more clear picture what is going on and your findings agree > with my own observations. > > My location is excellent for reception of Canadian NDB's and I have been > monitoring them for 4 years now. > I use a PERSEUS SDR which is recording 200 - 600 kHz every night. > This summer the path to New Foundland has been open almost every night. > Until the latests solar event, accompanied with a major drop in the Kyoto > Dst figures. > > We will see how long it takes to recover. > > Best regards, > Roelof, pa0rdt >