MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <006101cd57a3$92fa37d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <006101cd57a3$92fa37d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 18:25:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJW4BF=FKfO8GvZgkoS4eQQr2Eau9z0MA+FOqEk7fOiBQ1_deA@mail.gmail.com>
From: PA7EY <pa7ey@amsat.org>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: opera reports
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2346ff6a841204c3c7219d
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m016.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b4ff07a361fc3
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


--e89a8f2346ff6a841204c3c7219d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Mal,

I was surprized to see your call on Opera.

Yes, your observations are correct, in the sense that most of the receivers
aren't that bad, neither are the antenna's looking at them as plain
transducers to/from EM-waves. The man-made local noise is what makes things
so bad. Living in a dense urban environment has its disadvantages......

Nevertheless, LF/MF is very enjoyable for most of us I guess.
I am still busy finding and eliminating sources of noise in my home and
neighbourhood, quite challenging at times, but part of the fun as well.

Not transmitting yet, but working on that too, hope to meet you on MF/LF in
the  future, al well as all other LF/MF "addicts"

73 Ulrich, PA7EY

2012/7/1 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>

> **
>     Just looking at PA0A reports and they look vy poor which would
> indicate poor receivers es antennas, whereas my report was +3 dB
>
> g3kev
>
>

--e89a8f2346ff6a841204c3c7219d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mal,<div><br></div><div>I was surprized to see your call on Opera.</div>=
<div><br></div><div>Yes, your observations are correct, in the sense that m=
ost of the receivers aren&#39;t that bad, neither are the antenna&#39;s loo=
king at them as plain transducers to/from EM-waves. The man-made local nois=
e is what makes things so bad. Living in a dense urban environment has its =
disadvantages......</div>
<div><br></div><div>Nevertheless, LF/MF is very enjoyable for most of us I =
guess.</div><div>I am still busy finding and eliminating sources of noise i=
n my home and neighbourhood, quite challenging at times, but part of the fu=
n as well.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Not transmitting yet, but working on that too, hope to =
meet you on MF/LF in the =A0future, al well as all other LF/MF &quot;addict=
s&quot;</div><div>=A0</div><div>73 Ulrich, PA7EY<br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">
2012/7/1 mal hamilton <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:g3kevmal@talk=
talk.net" target=3D"_blank">g3kevmal@talktalk.net</a>&gt;</span><br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<u></u>





<div bgcolor=3D"#ffffff">
<div><font face=3D"Arial">=A0=A0=A0 Just looking at PA0A reports and they=
=20
look vy poor which would indicate poor receivers es antennas, whereas my re=
port=20
was +3 dB</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial"></font>=A0</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">g3kev</font></div>
<div>=A0</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--e89a8f2346ff6a841204c3c7219d--