Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0039E380000A6; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:14:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sq29k-0004Od-G3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:13:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sq29j-0004OU-O6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:13:07 +0100 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sq29h-0007Sw-GK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:13:06 +0100 Received: by bkty15 with SMTP id y15so6177751bkt.16 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3ZlkfMa13S9spwKGIi5laq+3HEbhjgQ2Wg9eEKmi7so=; b=JjCx2WcF95NV2EU11UisBA5yt2xatr5h4Ccep4Rx8gx3CVTqwGXFCk1AxpY1ucd/ut qoCWgl/FZkis/spJQQzXqWbMT7LOynGW8FzC8um+Pw7kvb4Qld6zYJmRsA/tnSYBo+UV kNGFD1tN4lfaTAz/5K5OcFE1H6oggvBK4XGXTAPtmiVdOjItuadmZOl5TGf67uBw5wIi lPWpV1zj8qsgezjg+Bwm7cd0Ky/a0w9pNnHwjeU9YOEX4A9NaS2Zts1wa3i3W0QoWaZZ vY6BIuFJRjzL/r8iFNAOSZ6gdMi4r+s7+t/L+mEMgH2T5OYFEyikVvIxvg2ubKPMUc71 qNEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.133.11 with SMTP id hw11mr2619148bkc.46.1342271584119; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.185.198 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:13:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50016531.4090905@xs4all.nl> References: <2EF69530CC694F89ADDC70851C979A5D@AGB> <5988673200AC4A4C88526277AC77AB1E@AGB> <50016531.4090905@xs4all.nl> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:13:04 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Graham, Likewise I still prefer WSPR. Decodes occur at similar levels to OP2 and the interface and web database features make it the more attractive mode, for me. I'll continue to play with both though and make a more informed view later. The OOK feature of OPERA I can see is attractive for many. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.214.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 13abe497adcf17a4e25c5e2a2ff79111 Subject: Re: LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce03e0af6aa5e04c4c9f43c X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:495710272:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m013.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da500170a07edb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --000e0ce03e0af6aa5e04c4c9f43c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Graham, Likewise I still prefer WSPR. Decodes occur at similar levels to OP2 and the interface and web database features make it the more attractive mode, for me. I'll continue to play with both though and make a more informed view later. The OOK feature of OPERA I can see is attractive for many. Hope to be QRP testing again this evening, probably TXing on WSPR and monitoring both WSPR and OPERA on 500kHz USB dial. I would like to find out if GM4SLV can decode me on either mode using my current set-up. Will you be around John P-G? 73s Roger G3XBM On 14 July 2012 13:25, Albert wrote: > *Graham, > > Regarding your dual mode 500 kHz tests yesterday. For me the absolute > winner is WSPR, when Opera stopped to decode, due to QSB, WSPR continued > with decodes at least 3 to 4 dB deeper into the noise. > > 73, Albert PA0A* > > > QRT 0000z > > Thanks all for reports > > 73 -Graham, > > *From:* Graham > *Sent:* Friday, July 13, 2012 7:06 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz > > All, > > DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz > > Running dual beacon , parallel Tx times ......Tx 100% duty cycle > > Dial set 500.000 Khz USB > > 73 - Graham > G0NBD > > > > > > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --000e0ce03e0af6aa5e04c4c9f43c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Graham,

Likewise I still prefer WSPR.

Decodes occur at si= milar levels to OP2 and the interface and web database features make it the= more attractive mode, for me. I'll continue to play with both though a= nd make a more informed view later. The OOK feature of OPERA I can see is a= ttractive for many.

Hope to be QRP testing again this evening, probably TXing on WSPR and m= onitoring both WSPR and OPERA on 500kHz USB dial. I would like to find out = if GM4SLV can decode me on either mode using my current set-up. Will you be= around John P-G?

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 14 July 2012 13= :25, Albert <westberg@xs4all.nl> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Graham,

Regarding your dual mode 500 kHz tests yesterday. For me the absolute winner is WSPR, when Opera stopped to decode, due to QSB, WSPR continued with decodes at least 3 to 4 dB deeper into the noise.

73, Albert PA0A



=20 =20
QRT=A0 0000z
=A0
Thanks=A0 all=A0 for=A0 reports=A0
=A0
73 -Graham,

From: Graham
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:06 PM
Subject: LF: DUAL BEACON WSPR + OPERA 500Khz

All,
=A0
DUAL=A0 BEACON=A0=A0 WSPR + OPERA=A0=A0 500Khz
=A0
Running=A0=A0 dual=A0 beacon=A0 , parallel=A0=A0 Tx times ......= Tx=A0=A0 100%=A0=A0 duty cycle
=A0
Dial=A0 set=A0=A0 500.000=A0 Khz=A0 USB=A0
=A0
73 - Graham
G0NBD
=A0
=A0
=A0





--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://ww= w.g3xbm.co.uk
https:= //sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.co= m/

--000e0ce03e0af6aa5e04c4c9f43c--