Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6AE5B380000BF; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SpNWR-0005Ob-Mt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SpNWQ-0005OS-TQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:50 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SpNWO-0004UT-Nk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:49 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.151]) by mwinf5d28 with ME id ZVpm1j00J3FioTm03Vpn9d; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:49:47 +0200 Message-ID: <856DAA37A9884DA6AA1D0FA08D4BBAB4@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4FFDA05B.5040404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8FDE51A39EEB4BA7A99AE333B936FDC9@AGB> <4FFDA9A2.4070709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1749F6141C6F4D60A982763ACAFF7074@AGB> <4FFDAFA7.6080409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <34B6D32736C043289C5F58C66647F24A@AGB> <4FFDD481.2080602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FFDD481.2080602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 502.5 may be a good frequency to call on then ? Signals will not be very strong , so a nominated qrg would help to catch something ! G.. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 21e2055b299bd63ed331c37c8a3e15ca Subject: Re: LF: MF CW x band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01CD605F.1BB99840" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:469585792:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4fff0ea44366 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CD605F.1BB99840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 502.5 may be a good frequency to call on then ? Signals will not be very strong , so a nominated qrg would = help to catch something ! G.. From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: MF CW x band Am 11.07.2012 20:39, schrieb Graham:=20 Ok=20 Q what is the 501/504 calling qrg for x-band 477 cw ?=20 Undefined i think.=20 I'm watching 500...503 kHz and 502.5 has the lowest local QRM here. When = active you can see what i see at = http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html Just a few months left and we're all together on the new band.=20 BTW what about the other countries such as France? For which countries = is it sure that the band can be used from 1st January 2013 ?? 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CD605F.1BB99840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
502.5   may  be  a  good  =20 frequency  to  call  on  then ?
 
Signals  will  not  be  very  strong , = so =20 a  nominated   qrg  would  help  to =20 catch  something  !
 
G..

From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:31 PM
Subject: LF: MF CW x band


Am 11.07.2012 20:39, schrieb Graham:=20
Ok=20

Q what is the  501/504   calling   = qrg =20 for  x-band    477  cw  ?=20

Undefined i think.

I'm watching 500...503 = kHz and=20 502.5 has the lowest local QRM here. When active you can see what i see = at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html

Just=20 a few months left and we're all together on the new band.
BTW what = about the=20 other countries such as France? For which countries is it sure = that the=20 band can be used from 1st January 2013 ??

73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CD605F.1BB99840--