Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8B4333800008B; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:52:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Supdo-0003t5-1r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:52:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Supdn-0003sw-GT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:51:59 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Supdl-0002qe-Ac for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:51:58 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6RIpuSO008965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:51:56 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6RIptBj004318 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:51:55 +0200 Message-ID: <5012E2BB.7010203@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:49:31 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50113D08.8020407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5011AD16.5000706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q6RIpuSO008965 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Warren, :-) That's nice. I searched for a similar video. But the 4guys are not so clever and the wind was rather moderate. At > 4 BFT you have no chance to bring that kite down by hand. It is important just to pull it down into the direction where the wind blows, to minimize the forces. I'm using a deflection roller out of stainless steel which are used by sailors. These are hold by a big supporting loop: http://www.drachenshop.de/images/e-1012406_3.jpg Anyway it was a hard fight in one of the nights, the field completely in darkness and massive winds becoming stronger and stronger. That was when i've been young... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0 Subject: Re: LF: Kites Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:482763264:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a5012e387318b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Warren, :-) That's nice. I searched for a similar video. But the 4guys are not so=20 clever and the wind was rather moderate. At > 4 BFT you have no chance=20 to bring that kite down by hand. It is important just to pull it down=20 into the direction where the wind blows, to minimize the forces. I'm using a deflection roller out of stainless steel which are used by=20 sailors. These are hold by a big supporting loop:=20 http://www.drachenshop.de/images/e-1012406_3.jpg Anyway it was a hard=20 fight in one of the nights, the field completely in darkness and massive=20 winds becoming stronger and stronger. That was when i've been young... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 27.07.2012 20:31, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > Stefan, > I saw this Youtube video of 4 big guys trying to bring down a kite > like yours: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DK7q34sw4XMo > > I would love to try this but I live in an area densely covered with > tall trees, and it would be quite a drive to an open area where I > could launch an antenna (children's playground is not a good place for > a HV antenna!) > > 73 Warren K2ORS > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Stefan Sch=E4fer > wrote: > =20 >> Hello Warren, >> >> Am 26.07.2012 19:39, schrieb Warren Ziegler: >> >> =20 >>> Stefan, >>> I imagine that a LF or VLF small vertical is a relatively high= -Q >>> circuit, how do you manage to keep the kite vertical in resonance and >>> matched while the kite bounces around in the wind? >>> >>> =20 >> Most of the time the kite was quite stable, i.e. the angle and so the = C did >> not change significantly. The antenna current is stable within a 10% l= imit. >> When the wind was poor in some situations, the kite drops to a lower a= ngle. >> Then the falling ERP is rather affected by the lower effective height = than >> by the changing current. The current (say 1A on 8970 Hz) can easyly dr= op to >> 400 mA when the angle changes from 80 deg to 40 deg. >> One method is to compensate this by turning the variometer from time t= o time >> or you can use a working point of the variometer that uses a slightly = to low >> L. Then the antenna current does not reduce when the kite falls (in ce= rtain >> limits of course). This is the case because the little generator that = i used >> (up to 550 W RF power in the best times) can be seen as something like= a >> constant power source. So if the kite falls then slightly, the working= point >> moves to the peak of the resonance curve and the rotation speed is som= ewhat >> lowered. It was funny to observe this effect for many hours on the fie= ld :-) >> But normally the movement of the wire does not strongly change the ant= enna >> current. >> >> OK? >> >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> =20 > > > =20