Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C6D0A38000043; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SuVa6-0008VE-Vh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:26:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SuVa6-0008V5-GM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:26:50 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SuVa4-0005Y3-Pu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:26:49 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QLQlro003619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:26:48 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6QLQlEL004435 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:26:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5011B589.6050006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:24:25 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1e666cdf35df4a12a042be0086ce28c0@kabelmail.de> <5011B417.1000006@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <5011B417.1000006@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wow, that sounds nice. Seems i have missed something tonite. Would someone still be QRV if i go on air in 30 minutes? Uwe maybe? 73, Stefan Am 26.07.2012 23:18, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Hello Uwe, > > Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about > to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way > above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit > earlier but I didn't manage to get a response. > Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and > listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters > was worse than on MF for some reason. > Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early > evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 > wavelenghts apart :) > > 73, > Wolf . > > Am 26.07.2012 22:33, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: >> Hello Wolf, >> >> I read your mail only now. >> OK, it was a success. tks for the QSO agn. >> >> did you make general calls (CQ) until our qso ? >> if yes, did you have any reactions? >> >> GL >> Uwe/dj8wx > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: Re: LF: DJ6GT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050209080002080502090607" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:503441536:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608d5011b64d6a86 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050209080002080502090607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wow, that sounds nice. Seems i have missed something tonite. Would someone still be QRV if i go on air in 30 minutes? Uwe maybe? 73, Stefan Am 26.07.2012 23:18, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Hello Uwe, > > Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about > to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way > above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit > earlier but I didn't manage to get a response. > Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and > listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters > was worse than on MF for some reason. > Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early > evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 > wavelenghts apart :) > > 73, > Wolf . > > Am 26.07.2012 22:33, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: >> Hello Wolf, >> >> I read your mail only now. >> OK, it was a success. tks for the QSO agn. >> >> did you make general calls (CQ) until our qso ? >> if yes, did you have any reactions? >> >> GL >> Uwe/dj8wx > --------------050209080002080502090607 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q6QLQlro003619 Wow, that sounds nice.
Seems i have missed something tonite.
Would someone still be QRV if i go on air in 30 minutes? Uwe maybe?

73, Stefan

Am 26.07.2012 23:18, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Hello Uwe,

Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit earlier but I didn't manage to get a response.
Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters was worse than on MF for some reason.
Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 wavelenghts apart :)

73,
=A0 Wolf .

Am 26.07.2012 22:33, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: