Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E693C38000093; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:21:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SuVUP-0008OG-4T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:20:57 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SuVUO-0008O7-IY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:20:56 +0100 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SuVUM-0005Ux-Qg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:20:55 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SuVUL-0002XQ-GJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:20:53 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:56854 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SuVUL-0000YM-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:20:53 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.25] (port=46596 helo=15.mx.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SuVRi-0008U5-E5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:18:10 +0200 Received: from blfd-4db03192.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.49.146]:4080 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 15.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1SuVRi-0006Mb-5m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:18:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5011B417.1000006@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:18:15 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1e666cdf35df4a12a042be0086ce28c0@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: <1e666cdf35df4a12a042be0086ce28c0@kabelmail.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Uwe, Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit earlier but I didn't manage to get a response. Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters was worse than on MF for some reason. Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 wavelenghts apart :) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: Re: LF: DJ6GT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010909070104090405070901" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:476833984:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411a5011b4ec2fd0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010909070104090405070901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Uwe, Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit earlier but I didn't manage to get a response. Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters was worse than on MF for some reason. Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 wavelenghts apart :) 73, Wolf . Am 26.07.2012 22:33, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: > Hello Wolf, > > I read your mail only now. > OK, it was a success. tks for the QSO agn. > > did you make general calls (CQ) until our qso ? > if yes, did you have any reactions? > > GL > Uwe/dj8wx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Gesendet: 26.07.2012 18:43 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: LF: DJ6GT > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hello Uwe, > > Are you still near the radio ? > I could be QRV in about half an hour from DF0WD; normal CW > preferred... before the T-storms are closing in. > > 73, > Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD . > > Am 26.07.2012 18:22, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de: >> Hi, >> >> is DJ6GT on this reflector? >> 12min ago he/she reacted on my CQ on 472,5kHz but didnt come in agn. >> >> 73 >> Uwe/dj8wx > --------------010909070104090405070901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello Uwe,

Thanks also for the nice unexpected contact. Indeed I was just about to leave the station when I heared your call - very strong here, way above the QRN. There was a DK3 station tuning and testing a bit earlier but I didn't manage to get a response.
Yes I had called CQ for a couple of times on various frequencies, and listened on 501..503 and also on 3565+x kHz, but the QRN on 80 meters was worse than on MF for some reason.
Also made a solid 'groundwave' contact with Uli DJ9IE in the early evening, 599 both sides, but no big surprise since we are only 100 wavelenghts apart :)

73,
  Wolf .

Am 26.07.2012 22:33, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de:
Hello Wolf,

I read your mail only now.
OK, it was a success. tks for the QSO agn.

did you make general calls (CQ) until our qso ?
if yes, did you have any reactions?

GL
Uwe/dj8wx


Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 26.07.2012 18:43
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: DJ6GT


Hello Uwe,

Are you still near the radio ?
I could be QRV in about half an hour from DF0WD; normal CW preferred... before the T-storms are closing in.

73,
  Wolf DL4YHF / DF0WD .

Am 26.07.2012 18:22, schrieb uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de:
Hi,

is DJ6GT on this reflector?
12min ago he/she reacted on my CQ on 472,5kHz but didnt come in agn.

73
Uwe/dj8wx


--------------010909070104090405070901--