Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0590E3800008E; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:50:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Su2ti-0001wd-Lz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:49:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Su2ti-0001wU-7n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:49:10 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Su2tg-0005Ic-4K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:49:09 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6PEmrm4007705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:48:53 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q6PEmq4p022398 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:48:52 +0200 Message-ID: <501006C7.9040600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:46:31 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003001cd6a40$a9199650$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <500FEE4B.5030401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001701cd6a71$c05b73c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <001701cd6a71$c05b73c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hopefully this will change next year. BTW, this month, the German amateur radio magazine CQDL (http://www.darc.de/cq-dl/) tells about the new MF allocation. I have found it in my post yesterday.I guess there will be plenty of radio amateurs normally operating on HF taking a look into the new band. So if we want to have an active MF band it may be good to do some activity there, best in CW. Certainly it is much more fascinating for a newcomer to listen to a QSO between amateurs than listening the NDB signals. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: MF DOPOLE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020206060008030707060300" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d501007a06eba X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020206060008030707060300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hopefully this will change next year. BTW, this month, the German amateur radio magazine CQDL (http://www.darc.de/cq-dl/) tells about the new MF allocation. I have found it in my post yesterday.I guess there will be plenty of radio amateurs normally operating on HF taking a look into the new band. So if we want to have an active MF band it may be good to do some activity there, best in CW. Certainly it is much more fascinating for a newcomer to listen to a QSO between amateurs than listening the NDB signals. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 25.07.2012 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: > Stefan > The reason that I work QSX ie listen on 7033 is because other > countries DO NOT have a permit to transmitt on 500. > also 500 Khz is a minority interest for radio amateurs throughout the > world, very few are listening world wide. > mal/g3kev > --------------020206060008030707060300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hopefully this will change next year.

BTW, this month, the German amateur radio magazine CQDL (http://www.darc.de/cq-dl/) tells about the new MF allocation. I have found it in my post yesterday.I guess there will be plenty of radio amateurs normally operating on HF taking a look into the new band.
So if we want to have an active MF band it may be good to do some activity there, best in CW. Certainly it is much more fascinating for a newcomer to listen to a QSO between amateurs than listening the NDB signals.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 25.07.2012 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton:
Stefan
The reason that I work QSX ie listen on 7033 is because other countries DO NOT have a permit to transmitt on 500.
also 500 Khz is a minority interest for radio amateurs throughout the world, very few are listening world wide.
mal/g3kev
 

--------------020206060008030707060300--